145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35508345)
1. Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: an interview study with women in England.
Nemec M; Waller J; Barnes J; Marlow LAV
BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e058635. PubMed ID: 35508345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing key messages about extending cervical screening intervals.
A V Marlow L; Nemec M; Barnes J; Waller J
Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Aug; 105(8):2757-2762. PubMed ID: 35440375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximising the acceptability of extended time intervals between screens in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: An online experimental study.
Hill E; Nemec M; Marlow L; Sherman SM; Waller J
J Med Screen; 2021 Sep; 28(3):333-340. PubMed ID: 33175638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's acceptability of and experience with primary human papillomavirus testing for cervix screening: HPV FOCAL trial cross-sectional online survey results.
Smith LW; Racey CS; Gondara L; Krajden M; Lee M; Martin RE; Stuart G; Peacock S; Coldman AJ; Franco EL; van Niekerk D; Ogilvie GS
BMJ Open; 2021 Oct; 11(10):e052084. PubMed ID: 34620663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extension of cervical screening intervals with primary human papillomavirus testing: observational study of English screening pilot data.
Rebolj M; Cuschieri K; Mathews CS; Pesola F; Denton K; Kitchener H;
BMJ; 2022 May; 377():e068776. PubMed ID: 35640960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information needs among women taking part in primary HPV screening in England: a content analysis.
Marlow L; Forster AS; McBride E; Rockliffe L; Kitchener H; Waller J
BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e044630. PubMed ID: 33323451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study.
Dodd RH; Mac OA; McCaffery KJ
BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e039041. PubMed ID: 32665351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human papillomavirus-based screening at extended intervals missed fewer cervical precancers than cytology in the HPV For Cervical Cancer (HPV FOCAL) trial.
Gottschlich A; Gondara L; Smith LW; Cook D; Martin RE; Lee M; Peacock S; Proctor L; Stuart G; Krajden M; Franco EL; van Niekerk D; Ogilvie G
Int J Cancer; 2022 Sep; 151(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 35460070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychological Impact of Primary Screening (PIPS) for HPV: a protocol for a cross-sectional evaluation within the NHS cervical screening programme.
McBride E; Marlow L; Forster AS; Moss S; Myles J; Kitchener H; Patnick J; Waller J
BMJ Open; 2016 Dec; 6(12):e014356. PubMed ID: 28011816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding the Acceptability and Uptake of HPV Self-Sampling Amongst Women Under- or Never-Screened for Cervical Cancer in Toronto (Ontario, Canada): An Intervention Study Protocol.
Lofters A; Devotta K; Prakash V; Vahabi M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's attitudes towards a human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening strategy: a systematic review.
Nothacker J; Nury E; Roebl Mathieu M; Raatz H; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2022 Oct; 48(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 36223918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "A lot can happen in five years": Women's attitudes to extending cervical screening intervals.
Kola-Palmer S; Rogers M; Halliday A; Rickford R
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2022 Nov; 31(6):e13655. PubMed ID: 35838304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's intentions to self-collect samples for human papillomavirus testing in an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Smith LW; Khurshed F; van Niekerk DJ; Krajden M; Greene SB; Hobbs S; Coldman AJ; Franco EL; Ogilvie GS
BMC Public Health; 2014 Oct; 14():1060. PubMed ID: 25303975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethnographic study of the barriers and facilitators to implementing human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as a primary screening strategy for cervical cancer among Inuit women of Nunavik, Northern Quebec.
Gamelin R; Hébert M; Tratt E; Brassard P
Int J Circumpolar Health; 2022 Dec; 81(1):2032930. PubMed ID: 35166191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary HPV DNA based cervical cancer screening at 25 years: Views of young Australian women aged 16-28 years.
Jayasinghe Y; Rangiah C; Gorelik A; Ogilvie G; Wark JD; Hartley S; Garland SM
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S74-S80. PubMed ID: 26589584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National experience in the first two years of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening in an HPV vaccinated population in Australia: observational study.
Smith MA; Sherrah M; Sultana F; Castle PE; Arbyn M; Gertig D; Caruana M; Wrede CD; Saville M; Canfell K
BMJ; 2022 Mar; 376():e068582. PubMed ID: 35354610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) test acceptability in primary screening for cervical cancer: A mixed methods research synthesis.
Tatar O; Thompson E; Naz A; Perez S; Shapiro GK; Wade K; Zimet G; Gilca V; Janda M; Kahn J; Daley E; Rosberger Z
Prev Med; 2018 Nov; 116():40-50. PubMed ID: 30172799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
