These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35508540)

  • 1. Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results.
    Meher PK; Rustgi S; Kumar A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jun; 128(6):519-530. PubMed ID: 35508540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
    Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient weighting methods for genomic best linear-unbiased prediction (BLUP) adapted to the genetic architectures of quantitative traits.
    Ren D; An L; Li B; Qiao L; Liu W
    Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Feb; 126(2):320-334. PubMed ID: 32980863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.
    Chen L; Li C; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101544. PubMed ID: 25025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of genomic breeding values of milk traits in Brazilian Saanen goats.
    de Sousa DR; do Nascimento AV; Lôbo RNB
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Sep; 138(5):541-551. PubMed ID: 33861884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
    Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep.
    Vahedi SM; Salek Ardetani S; Brito LF; Karimi K; Pahlavan Afshari K; Banabazi MH
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):335. PubMed ID: 37330501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
    van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
    BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).
    Resende MF; Muñoz P; Resende MD; Garrick DJ; Fernando RL; Davis JM; Jokela EJ; Martin TA; Peter GF; Kirst M
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1503-10. PubMed ID: 22271763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs.
    Yin C; Zhou P; Wang Y; Yin Z; Liu Y
    Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101062. PubMed ID: 38211414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle.
    Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.