These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35509384)

  • 1. Duplication and nonregistration of COVID-19 systematic reviews: Bibliometric review.
    Helliwell JA; Thompson J; Smart N; Jayne DG; Chapman SJ
    Health Sci Rep; 2022 May; 5(3):e541. PubMed ID: 35509384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and methodological quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews needs to be improved: an evidence mapping.
    Li Y; Cao L; Zhang Z; Hou L; Qin Y; Hui X; Li J; Zhao H; Cui G; Cui X; Li R; Lin Q; Li X; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():17-28. PubMed ID: 33657455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: a meta-research study.
    Abbott R; Bethel A; Rogers M; Whear R; Orr N; Shaw L; Stein K; Thompson Coon J
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2022 Jun; 27(3):169-177. PubMed ID: 34083212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
    Zheng Q; Lai F; Li B; Xu J; Long J; Peng S; Li Y; Liu Y; Xiao H
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():639652. PubMed ID: 34262914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
    Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
    Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epidemiology, methodological quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on coronavirus disease 2019: A cross-sectional study.
    Chen Y; Li L; Zhang Q; Liu H; Huang Y; Lin S; Yin G; Xie Q
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Nov; 100(47):e27950. PubMed ID: 34964777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.
    Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A
    Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Methodological and Reporting Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses about Chinese Medical Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
    Lyu Z; Huang Z; Liu F; Hou Z
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2020; 2020():3868057. PubMed ID: 33029131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
    Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extent and nature of duplication in PROSPERO using COVID-19-related registrations: a retrospective investigation and survey.
    Beresford L; Walker R; Stewart L
    BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e061862. PubMed ID: 36456005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review.
    Kim MM; Pound L; Steffensen I; Curtin GM
    Harm Reduct J; 2021 Nov; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 34838030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.