These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35509668)

  • 21. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Common errors in manuscripts submitted to medical science journals.
    Ezeala C; Nweke I; Ezeala M
    Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2013 Jul; 3(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 24116317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Poor title--poor manuscript?
    Gjersvik P; Gulbrandsen P; Aasheim ET; Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Dec; 133(23-24):2475-7. PubMed ID: 24326496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prospective analyses of sex/gender-related publication decisions in general medical journals: editorial rejection of population-based women's reproductive physiology.
    Kalidasan D; Goshtasebi A; Chrisler J; Brown HL; Prior JC
    BMJ Open; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e057854. PubMed ID: 35217542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal.
    Ray J; Berkwits M; Davidoff F
    Am J Med; 2000 Aug; 109(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 10967154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reviewer selection biases editorial decisions on manuscripts.
    Hausmann L; Schweitzer B; Middleton FA; Schulz JB
    J Neurochem; 2018 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 29377133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
    Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rejection Blues: Why Do Research Papers Get Rejected?
    Khadilkar SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2018 Aug; 68(4):239-241. PubMed ID: 30065536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ethical issues in studying submissions to a medical journal.
    Olson CM; Glass RM; Thacker SB; Stroup DF
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 9676686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: a follow-up analysis.
    McDonald RJ; Cloft HJ; Kallmes DF
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 19001539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Why We Say No! A Look Through the Editor's Eye".
    Garg A; Das S; Jain H
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Oct; 9(10):JB01-5. PubMed ID: 26557542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Editorial.
    Al-Deeb SM; Khan S
    Neurosciences (Riyadh); 2009 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21048564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
    Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Journal response types and times: the outcomes of manuscripts finalised for submission by the University of the Free State School of Medicine medical editor, South Africa.
    Joubert G; Mulder T; Steinberg WJ; Botes J
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():212. PubMed ID: 32963678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts.
    Abby M; Massey MD; Galandiuk S; Polk HC
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 8015116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and the Lancet.
    Marusić A; Lukić IK; Marusić M; McNamee D; Sharp D; Horton R
    Croat Med J; 2002 Jun; 43(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 12035133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.