These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3551010)
1. Mandibular posterior blade implants. A twelve year clinical and statistical evaluation. Ferrer F; Castillo J; Rodríguez H; Guzmán J; Korchin L; Cabañas R Rev Odontol P R; 1986; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 3551010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The FES implant as a posterior abutment for a fixed prosthesis in the mandible. Fagan MJ J Ga Dent Assoc; 1979; 52(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 390975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ramus implant. Kay HM; Kay GW CDS Rev; 1978 Mar; 71(3):22-6. PubMed ID: 367605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Displacements of precious and nonprecious dental bridges utilizing endosseous implants as distal abutments. Bidez MW; Lemons JE; Isenberg BP J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 3522594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Case report: a blade implant of more than nine years duration. Zuckerman J J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1978; 52(4):145-6. PubMed ID: 114560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Principles and treatment planning considerations for successful endosteal blade implantology (II). Judy KW; Weiss CM Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1979 Jan; 10(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 399006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An alternative technique to the endosseous blade implant. Fagan MJ J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(4):559-62. PubMed ID: 398890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study. Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusal force pattern in dentitions restored with mandibular bridges supported on osseointegrated implants. Lundgren D; Laurell L; Bergendal T Swed Dent J Suppl; 1985; 28():107-15. PubMed ID: 3904054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Endosseous blade implant: how and why. Zuckerman J J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1979; 53(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 121300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The remus implant. Kay HM J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 297802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses. Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endosteal blade-vent implants. Babbush CA Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Jan; 30(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 3514295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Healing of Osseotite implants under submerged and immediate loading conditions in a single patient: a case report and interface analysis after 2 months. Testori T; Szmukler-Moncler S; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Trisi P; Weinstein RL Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 12212681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]