These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35511475)

  • 1. Open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy a viable option in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Klevebro F; Han S; Ash S; Mueller C; Cools-Lartigue J; Maynard N; Ferri L; Low D
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35511475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contemporary outcomes of left thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy due to cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, a multicenter cohort study.
    Klevebro F; Ash S; Mueller C; Garbarino GM; Gisbertz SS; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Mandeville Y; Ferri L; Davies A; Maynard N; Low DE
    Dis Esophagus; 2024 Aug; 37(9):. PubMed ID: 38678385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
    Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
    Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Perioperative Outcomes by Esophagectomy Surgical Technique.
    Meredith KL; Maramara T; Blinn P; Lee D; Huston J; Shridhar R
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(6):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 31197697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma.
    Yu L; Wu JX; Gao YS; Li JY; Zhang YF; Ke J
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2382-9. PubMed ID: 26416374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.
    Klevebro F; Scandavini CM; Kamiya S; Nilsson M; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 29897443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
    Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
    J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
    Takahashi M; Toyama H; Takahashi K; Kaiho Y; Ejima Y; Yamauchi M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 38238681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
    Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
    Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.