These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Keep flexible-Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching. Fröber K; Jurczyk V; Dreisbach G J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 34941340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Slowing after Observed Error Transfers across Tasks. Wang L; Pan W; Tan J; Liu C; Chen A PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149836. PubMed ID: 26934579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surprise as an explanation to auditory novelty distraction and post-error slowing. Parmentier FBR; Vasilev MR; Andrés P J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 30346199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching. Liu C; Yeung N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):131-154. PubMed ID: 31985251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of objective and introspective switch costs in voluntary task choice. Mendl J; Dreisbach G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1373-1389. PubMed ID: 36222674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The contribution of task-choice response selection to the switch cost in voluntary task switching. Liefooghe B Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jul; 178():32-40. PubMed ID: 28570859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midsession reversal learning: Pigeons learn what stimulus to avoid. Zentall TR; Halloran M; Peng D J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 32212774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective confidence acts as an internal cost-benefit factor when choosing between tasks. Carlebach N; Yeung N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jul; 46(7):729-748. PubMed ID: 32271082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Error-induced adaptability: Behavioral and neural dynamics of response-stimulus interval modulations on posterror slowing. Li Q; Hu N; Li Y; Long Q; Gu Y; Tang Y; Chen A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 May; 150(5):851-863. PubMed ID: 33001683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Action monitoring in motor control: ERPs following selection and execution errors in a force production task. de Bruijn ER; Hulstijn W; Meulenbroek RG; Van Galen GP Psychophysiology; 2003 Sep; 40(5):786-95. PubMed ID: 14696732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective. Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):509-518. PubMed ID: 35403969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Smith TA; Kimball DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of preparation time and trial type probability on performance of anti- and pro-saccades. Pierce JE; McDowell JE Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():188-94. PubMed ID: 26829023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching. Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]