These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35511545)

  • 1. Performance errors influence voluntary task choices.
    Spitzer MWH; Kiesel A; Dignath D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jun; 48(6):665-688. PubMed ID: 35511545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Keep flexible-Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.
    Fröber K; Jurczyk V; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 34941340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Slowing after Observed Error Transfers across Tasks.
    Wang L; Pan W; Tan J; Liu C; Chen A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149836. PubMed ID: 26934579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behavior.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1529-1548. PubMed ID: 31436454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-based expectancy in temporally structured task switching.
    Aufschnaiter S; Kiesel A; Dreisbach G; Wenke D; Thomaschke R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):856-870. PubMed ID: 29154625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errors in task switching: Investigating error aftereffects in a N-2 repetition cost paradigm.
    Moretti L; Koch I; Steinhauser M; Schuch S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1720-1737. PubMed ID: 34694830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item-specific priming of voluntary task switches.
    Chiu YC; Fröber K; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):434-441. PubMed ID: 32223294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual processing demands influence voluntary task choice.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Kiesel A
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105232. PubMed ID: 35933797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surprise as an explanation to auditory novelty distraction and post-error slowing.
    Parmentier FBR; Vasilev MR; Andrés P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 30346199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching.
    Liu C; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):131-154. PubMed ID: 31985251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of objective and introspective switch costs in voluntary task choice.
    Mendl J; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1373-1389. PubMed ID: 36222674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of task-choice response selection to the switch cost in voluntary task switching.
    Liefooghe B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jul; 178():32-40. PubMed ID: 28570859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Midsession reversal learning: Pigeons learn what stimulus to avoid.
    Zentall TR; Halloran M; Peng D
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 32212774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective confidence acts as an internal cost-benefit factor when choosing between tasks.
    Carlebach N; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jul; 46(7):729-748. PubMed ID: 32271082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Error-induced adaptability: Behavioral and neural dynamics of response-stimulus interval modulations on posterror slowing.
    Li Q; Hu N; Li Y; Long Q; Gu Y; Tang Y; Chen A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 May; 150(5):851-863. PubMed ID: 33001683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Action monitoring in motor control: ERPs following selection and execution errors in a force production task.
    de Bruijn ER; Hulstijn W; Meulenbroek RG; Van Galen GP
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Sep; 40(5):786-95. PubMed ID: 14696732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):509-518. PubMed ID: 35403969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of preparation time and trial type probability on performance of anti- and pro-saccades.
    Pierce JE; McDowell JE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():188-94. PubMed ID: 26829023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.
    Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.