206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35512160)
1. Early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty: a narrative overview of potentially associated factors.
van Otten TJM; van Loon CJM
Acta Orthop Belg; 2022 Mar; 88(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 35512160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure at the Tibial Cement-Implant Interface With the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kopinski JE; Aggarwal A; Nunley RM; Barrack RL; Nam D
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2579-2582. PubMed ID: 27155996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is cement mantle thickness a primary cause of aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty?
Cox ZC; Engstrom SM; Shinar AA; Polkowski GG; Mason JB; Martin JR
Knee; 2023 Jan; 40():305-312. PubMed ID: 36592499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aseptic Loosening at the Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Function of Cement Mantle Quality?
Hampton CB; Berliner ZP; Nguyen JT; Mendez L; Smith SS; Joseph AD; Padgett DE; Rodriguez JA
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S190-S196. PubMed ID: 32171492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low Rates of Aseptic Tibial Loosening in Obese Patients With Use of High-Viscosity Cement and Standard Tibial Tray: 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up.
Crawford DA; Berend KR; Nam D; Barrack RL; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9S):S183-S186. PubMed ID: 28511945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.
Kelly MP; Illgen RL; Chen AF; Nam D
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Nov; 33(11):3460-3464. PubMed ID: 30057268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using High-Viscosity Cement is Associated With Higher Odds of Revision for Aseptic Loosening.
Buller LT; Rao V; Chiu YF; Nam D; McLawhorn AS
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S182-S189. PubMed ID: 31521443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Where Is the "Weak Link" of Fixation in Contemporary Cemented Total Knee Replacements?
Martin JR; Otero JE; Mason JB; Fehring TK
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2497-2501. PubMed ID: 33676813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aseptic Tibial Implant Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Preventable?
Menken LG; Fleuriscar J; Weiner T; Berliner ZP; Rodriguez JA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 29(8):326-330. PubMed ID: 33828053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Varus Collapse in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Fixation or Bone Fail First?
Cox ZC; Green CC; Otero JE; Mason JB; Martin JR
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):162-167. PubMed ID: 34592354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Novel Percentage-Based System for Determining Aseptic Loosening of Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Components.
Chalmers BP; Sculco PK; Fehring KA; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2274-2278. PubMed ID: 28285901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Case series report: Early cement-implant interface fixation failure in total knee replacement.
Hazelwood KJ; O'Rourke M; Stamos VP; McMillan RD; Beigler D; Robb WJ
Knee; 2015 Oct; 22(5):424-8. PubMed ID: 25795544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Association Between Cement Viscosity and Revision Risk After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Wyatt RWB; Chang RN; Royse KE; Paxton EW; Namba RS; Prentice HA
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jun; 36(6):1987-1994. PubMed ID: 33610408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Loosening of tibia baseplates after total knee arthroplasty: Evaluation of pull-out strength of tibia baseplate-cement Interface.
Rebgetz P; Kovacs A; Bochat K; Hayes A; Clark G; Blakeney W; Pabbruwe M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Dec; 90():105497. PubMed ID: 34619452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No Difference in Revision Rate Between Low Viscosity and High Viscosity Cement Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Klasan A; Rainbird S; Peng Y; Holder C; Parkinson B; Young SW; Lewis PL
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Oct; 37(10):2025-2034. PubMed ID: 35525417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant differences in rates of aseptic loosening between two variations of a popular total knee arthroplasty design.
Brown M; Ramasubbu R; Jenkinson M; Doonan J; Blyth M; Jones B
Int Orthop; 2021 Nov; 45(11):2859-2867. PubMed ID: 34392378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underhang of the tibial component increases tibial bone resorption after total knee arthroplasty.
Gu S; Kuriyama S; Nakamura S; Nishitani K; Ito H; Matsuda S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 30470851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design.
Miller AJ; Stimac JD; Smith LS; Feher AW; Yakkanti MR; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1089-1093. PubMed ID: 29275115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Appearance and evolution of radiolucent lines below the tibial implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Wautier D; Thienpont E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Mar; 144(3):1333-1344. PubMed ID: 37878076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
