234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35512316)
1. Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse-Probability-Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects.
Gruber S; Phillips RV; Lee H; van der Laan MJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 191(9):1640-1651. PubMed ID: 35512316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On adaptive propensity score truncation in causal inference.
Ju C; Schwab J; van der Laan MJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1741-1760. PubMed ID: 29991330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Causal inference in case of near-violation of positivity: comparison of methods.
Léger M; Chatton A; Le Borgne F; Pirracchio R; Lasocki S; Foucher Y
Biom J; 2022 Dec; 64(8):1389-1403. PubMed ID: 34993990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Models for the propensity score that contemplate the positivity assumption and their application to missing data and causality.
Molina J; Sued M; Valdora M
Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3503-3518. PubMed ID: 29873100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
Schuler MS; Rose S
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Causal inference in the absence of positivity: The role of overlap weights.
Matsouaka RA; Zhou Y
Biom J; 2024 Jun; 66(4):e2300156. PubMed ID: 38847059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.
Cheng C; Li F; Thomas LE; Li FF
Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1140-1151. PubMed ID: 35238335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating average treatment effects for clustered RCTs with recruitment bias.
Schochet PZ
Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):452-474. PubMed ID: 38037270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis.
Lendle SD; Fireman B; van der Laan MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S91-8. PubMed ID: 23849159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing g-computation, propensity score-based weighting, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation for analyzing externally controlled trials with both measured and unmeasured confounders: a simulation study.
Ren J; Cislo P; Cappelleri JC; Hlavacek P; DiBonaventura M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):18. PubMed ID: 36647031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An application of collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation in causal inference and genomics.
Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 18. PubMed ID: 21731530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Viable Alternative When Propensity Scores Fail: Evaluation of Inverse Propensity Weighting and Sequential G-Estimation in a Two-Wave Mediation Model.
Valente MJ; MacKinnon DP; Mazza GL
Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):165-187. PubMed ID: 31220937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Weighted estimation for confounded binary outcomes subject to misclassification.
Gravel CA; Platt RW
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):425-436. PubMed ID: 29082530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.
Ertefaie A; Stephens DA
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 14. PubMed ID: 21969998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
