These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35512841)

  • 21. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function.
    Yashaswini L; Maruthy S
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression.
    Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.
    Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Janky KL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 29870520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction.
    Arslan RB; Ozdamar O; Ulgen Y
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aging and contralateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Parthasarathy TK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Feb; 12(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 11261461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.
    Marshall L; Lapsley Miller JA; Guinan JJ; Shera CA; Reed CM; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA; Boege P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2697-713. PubMed ID: 25373970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years.
    Ferguson MA; Smith PA; Davis AC; Lutman ME
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 10905398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of age on click-evoked otoacoustic emission: A systematic review.
    Liu J; Wang N
    Neural Regen Res; 2012 Apr; 7(11):853-61. PubMed ID: 25737714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. TEOAE suppression in adults with learning disabilities.
    Garinis AC; Glattke T; Cone-Wesson BK
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):607-14. PubMed ID: 18923982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Plinkert PK
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(4):177-88. PubMed ID: 10337508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contralateral suppression of linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates at risk for hearing loss.
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 17585930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Objective assessment of subjective tinnitus through contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions by white noise; suggested cut-off points.
    Riga M; Komis A; Maragkoudakis P; Korres G; Danielides V
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):775-781. PubMed ID: 27598848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression.
    Sliwinska-Kowalska M; Kotylo P
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 12212856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
    Maxim T; Shera CA; Charaziak KK; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Level on the Strength and Detectability of the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lewis JD
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1391-1403. PubMed ID: 30896525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
    Boothalingam S; Lineton B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.