BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35513321)

  • 1. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
    Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of pre- or subpectoral expander position with the fenestrated Acellular dermal matrix anterior coverage, on drainage volume and Seroma Formation after Non-Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Suh YC; Kim JK; Kim NR; Choi JS; Kim YJ; Lee JH; Jun YJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 33618944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.
    Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Pires G; Marquez JL; Memmott S; Sudduth JD; Moss W; Eddington D; Hobson G; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 37285211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.
    Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prepectoral Dual-Port Tissue Expander Placement: Can This Eliminate Suction Drain Use?
    Franck P; Chadab T; Poveromo L; Ellison A; Simmons R; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Jul; 85(S1 Suppl 1):S60-S62. PubMed ID: 32530848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.
    Haddock NT; Kadakia Y; Liu Y; Teotia SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34003807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Salibian AH; Harness JK; Mowlds DS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 28027223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.
    Nelson JA; Shamsunder MG; Vorstenbosch J; Polanco TO; Matros E; Coriddi MR; Mehrara BJ; Allen RJ; Dayan JH; Disa JJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):607e-616e. PubMed ID: 35103644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate Prepectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Is Equally Safe Following Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Henry N; Sebag V; Safran T; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T; Davison P; Vorstenbosch J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38775386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
    Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Sbitany H; Piper M; Lentz R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Sep; 140(3):432-443. PubMed ID: 28574950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early Complications in Prepectoral Breast Reconstructions with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Preliminary Analysis of Outcomes.
    Plotsker EL; Graziano FD; Rubenstein RN; Haglich K; Allen RJ; Coriddi MR; Dayan JH; Poulton R; McKernan C; Mehrara BJ; Matros E; Disa JJ; Nelson JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Apr; 153(4):786-793. PubMed ID: 37220401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.