These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35515884)

  • 1. DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions.
    Seelandt JC; Grande B; Kriech S; Kolbe M
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2018; 4(2):51-58. PubMed ID: 35515884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Helping healthcare teams to debrief effectively: associations of debriefers' actions and participants' reflections during team debriefings.
    Kolbe M; Grande B; Lehmann-Willenbrock N; Seelandt JC
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2023 Mar; 32(3):160-172. PubMed ID: 35902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.
    Hull L; Russ S; Ahmed M; Sevdalis N; Birnbach DJ
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2017; 3(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 35515097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communication content during debriefing in simulation-based medical education: An analytic framework and mixed-methods analysis.
    Berger-Estilita J; Lüthi V; Greif R; Abegglen S
    Med Teach; 2021 Dec; 43(12):1381-1390. PubMed ID: 34260335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approaches to interpersonal conflict in simulation debriefings: A qualitative study.
    Roze des Ordons AL; Cheng A; Lockyer J; Wilkie RD; Grant V; Eppich W
    Med Educ; 2021 Nov; 55(11):1284-1296. PubMed ID: 34291487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cultural differences in simulation debriefing: A qualitative analysis.
    Rana SC; Francis U; Zavi L; Ella S; Honein-Abou Haidar G; Peter D
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e14904. PubMed ID: 37064463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality with quantity? Evaluating interprofessional faculty prebriefs and debriefs for simulation training using video.
    Paige JT; Zamjahn JB; Carvalho RB; Yang S; Yu Q; Garbee DD; Kiselov VJ; Rusnak V; Bonanno L; Callan C
    Surgery; 2019 Jun; 165(6):1069-1074. PubMed ID: 30982645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating novice doctors' reflections in debriefings after simulation scenarios.
    Kihlgren P; Spanager L; Dieckmann P
    Med Teach; 2015 May; 37(5):437-43. PubMed ID: 25189085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners in simulation-based education: an integrative review.
    Kumar P; Somerville S
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2024 Jan; 9(1):5. PubMed ID: 38229166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.
    Coggins A; Hong SS; Baliga K; Halamek LP
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2022 Mar; 7(1):7. PubMed ID: 35256014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Faculty Development Workshop to Enhance Debriefing Skills Among Novice Facilitators.
    Abulebda K; Srinivasan S; Maa T; Stormorken A; Chumpitazi CE
    Cureus; 2020 Feb; 12(2):e6942. PubMed ID: 32195066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debriefing interaction patterns and learning outcomes in simulation: an observational mixed-methods network study.
    Abegglen S; Greif R; Balmer Y; Znoj HJ; Nabecker S
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2022 Sep; 7(1):28. PubMed ID: 36068593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Debriefing Assessment in Real Time (DART) tool for simulation-based medical education.
    Baliga K; Halamek LP; Warburton S; Mathias D; Yamada NK; Fuerch JH; Coggins A
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2023 Mar; 8(1):9. PubMed ID: 36918946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the simulation based training quality assurance tool (SBT-QA10) as a measure of learners' perceptions during the action phase of simulation.
    Ekelund K; O'Regan S; Dieckmann P; Østergaard D; Watterson L
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 May; 23(1):290. PubMed ID: 37127593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Student Performance During a Simulated Patient Encounter Has No Impact on Debriefer Adherence to PEARLS Debriefing Model.
    McNutt R; Tews M; Kleinheksel AJ
    Med Sci Educ; 2021 Jun; 31(3):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 34457957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does a Written Tool to Guide Structured Debriefing Improve Discourse? Implications for Interprofessional Team Simulation.
    Thompson R; Sullivan S; Campbell K; Osman I; Statz B; Jung HS
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):e240-e245. PubMed ID: 30093336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DebriefLive: A Pilot Study of a Virtual Faculty Development Tool for Debriefing.
    Wong NL; Peng C; Park CW; Pérez J; Vashi A; Robinson J; Okuda Y
    Simul Healthc; 2020 Oct; 15(5):363-369. PubMed ID: 32218088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cultural Prototypes and Differences in Simulation Debriefing.
    Ulmer FF; Sharara-Chami R; Lakissian Z; Stocker M; Scott E; Dieckmann P
    Simul Healthc; 2018 Aug; 13(4):239-246. PubMed ID: 29672469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Debriefing in Simulation-Based Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Evidence.
    Zhang H; Mörelius E; Goh SHL; Wang W
    Nurse Educ; 2019; 44(3):E1-E6. PubMed ID: 30015683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.