These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3551645)
1. Closed-suction versus Penrose drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized evaluation. Sarr MG; Parikh KJ; Minken SL; Zuidema GD; Cameron JL Am J Surg; 1987 Apr; 153(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 3551645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sump drainage versus static drainage after cholecystectomy. van der Linden W; Gedda S; Edlund G Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Jun; 152(6):829-30. PubMed ID: 7244965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter? Sánchez-Ortiz R; Madsen LT; Swanson DA; Canfield SE; Wood CG J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 14665885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-inferiority of open passive drains compared with closed suction drains in pancreatic surgery outcomes: A prospective observational study. Marchegiani G; Perri G; Pulvirenti A; Sereni E; Azzini AM; Malleo G; Salvia R; Bassi C Surgery; 2018 Sep; 164(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 29903511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection. Čečka F; Jon B; Skalický P; Čermáková E; Neoral Č; Loveček M Surgery; 2018 Nov; 164(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 30082139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not. Lewis RT; Goodall RG; Marien B; Park M; Lloyd-Smith W; Wiegand FM Am J Surg; 1990 Feb; 159(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 2405730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized trial of drainage after cholecystectomy. Suction vaersus static drainage through a main wound versus a stab incision. van der Linden W; Gedda S; Edlund G Am J Surg; 1981 Feb; 141(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 7006427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Emergency Cholecystectomy with Delayed Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage in Patients with Moderate Acute Cholecystitis. Ke CW; Wu SD J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Jun; 28(6):705-712. PubMed ID: 29658839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy. Fraser I; Everson NW; Nash JR Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1982 May; 64(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 7081917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of intraperitoneal drainage after cholecystectomy; a prospective ultrasonographic study. Kriplani AK; Sawhney S; Kumar S; Kapur BM Trop Gastroenterol; 1992; 13(4):146-51. PubMed ID: 1302384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cholecystectomy with closed suction drainage. Rivas AA; Holliday HJ; Wright JK South Med J; 1980 Feb; 73(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 7355312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage. Raves JJ; Slifkin M; Diamond DL Am J Surg; 1984 Nov; 148(5):618-20. PubMed ID: 6496851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Passive tube and suction drainage after elective cholecystectomy--a comparison using ultrasonography. Brewster NT; King PM; Cunningham C; Adam RD; Griffiths JM J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Oct; 37(5):325-7. PubMed ID: 1479562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DRAPA trial--closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Čečka F; Loveček M; Jon B; Skalický P; Šubrt Z; Ferko A Trials; 2015 May; 16():207. PubMed ID: 25947117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized trial of a closed-suction drain versus a Penrose drain after a colectomy. Shinohara T; Yamashita Y; Naito M; Maki K; Hashimoto T; Matsuo K; Yamauchi Y; Hoshino S; Tanaka S; Noritomi T; Shimura H Hepatogastroenterology; 2010; 57(102-103):1119-22. PubMed ID: 21410042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collections following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Monson JR; MacFie J; Irving H; Keane FB; Brennan TG; Tanner WA Br J Surg; 1986 Dec; 73(12):993-4. PubMed ID: 3539256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cholecystectomy with and without drainage. A randomized, prospective study of 300 patients. Budd DC; Cochran RC; Fouty WJ Am J Surg; 1982 Mar; 143(3):307-9. PubMed ID: 7065351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction? McCormack TT; Abel PD; Collins CD Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Sep; 65(5):326-8. PubMed ID: 6614773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cholecystectomy without drainage, nasogastric suction, and intravenous fluids. Man B; Kraus L; Motovic A Am J Surg; 1977 Mar; 133(3):312-4. PubMed ID: 576776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]