These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3551645)

  • 21. [Gravity drainage versus suction drainage: an experimental and clinical study].
    Gerngross H; Engler V
    Unfallchirurg; 1989 Jan; 92(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2644695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Closed suction drainage with or without re-transfusion of filtered shed blood does not offer advantages in primary non-cemented total hip replacement using a direct anterior approach.
    Kleinert K; Werner C; Mamisch-Saupe N; Kalberer F; Dora C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Jan; 132(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 21874574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cholecystectomy is safer without drainage: the results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Monson JR; Guillou PJ; Keane FB; Tanner WA; Brennan TG
    Surgery; 1991 Jun; 109(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 2042093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Suction drainage of the gallbladder bed does not prevent complications after cholecystectomy: a random control clinical trial.
    Playforth MJ; Sauven P; Evans M; Pollock AV
    Br J Surg; 1985 Apr; 72(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 3886068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Closed-suction compared with Penrose drainage after free flap reconstruction in the head and neck.
    Madgar O; Segal O; Mansour J; Sagiv D; Dubriyan A; Bedrin L; Talmi YP; Wolf M; Alon EE
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 57(10):1098-1101. PubMed ID: 31635760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomised comparison of three drainage systems following cholecystectomy.
    Loder PB; Smith GH; Morris S; Bambach CP; Smith RC
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1987 Aug; 57(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 3675403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Application of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess].
    Chen SQ; Liu WC; Zhang ZZ; Lin LY; Chen SM; Huang GL; Lin CZ; Wang L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 31054551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cholecystectomy: to drain or not to drain. A randomized prospective study of 200 patients.
    Maull KI; Daugherty ME; Shearer GR; Sachatello CR; Ernst CB; Meeker WR; Griffen WO
    J Surg Res; 1978 Apr; 24(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 347173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Closed suction drainage versus closed simple drainage in the management of modified radical mastectomy wounds.
    Ezeome ER; Adebamowo CA
    S Afr Med J; 2008 Sep; 98(9):712-5. PubMed ID: 19113053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Closed Suction Drainage Has No Benefits in Anterior Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.
    Suarez JC; McNamara CA; Barksdale LC; Calvo C; Szubski CR; Patel PD
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1954-8. PubMed ID: 27062352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Gurusamy KS; Samraj K; Mullerat P; Davidson BR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD006004. PubMed ID: 17636819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].
    Chintamani ; Singhal V; Singh J; Bansal A; Saxena S
    BMC Cancer; 2005 Jan; 5():11. PubMed ID: 15676064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The rational use of drains after cholecystectomy.
    Gupta S; Rauscher G; Stillman R; Fitzgerald J; Powers JC
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Feb; 146(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 622663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
    Peng S; Cheng Y; Yang C; Lu J; Wu S; Zhou R; Cheng N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; (8):CD010583. PubMed ID: 26292656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cholecystectomy: safe or not safe to drain?
    Mellor SG; Thomas MH; Donnellan BS
    J R Soc Med; 1988 Oct; 81(10):566-8. PubMed ID: 3184087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of two types of vacuum drainage after cholecystectomy.
    Salam IM; McMullin JP; O'Higgins NJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1984 May; 66(3):190-1. PubMed ID: 6721407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer. A prospective randomized trial.
    Somers RG; Jablon LK; Kaplan MJ; Sandler GL; Rosenblatt NK
    Ann Surg; 1992 Feb; 215(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 1546900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Use of a Closed-Suction Drain in Revision Knee Arthroplasty May Not Be Necessary: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Abolghasemian M; Huether TW; Soever LJ; Drexler M; MacDonald MP; Backstein DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1544-8. PubMed ID: 27036920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Drainage after cholecystectomy.
    Chilton CP; Mann CV
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1980 Jan; 62(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 7362191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The conduct of cholecystectomy: incision, drainage, bacteriology and postoperative complications.
    Lewis RT; Allan CM; Goodall RG; Marien B; Park M; Lloyd-Smith W; Wiegand FM
    Can J Surg; 1982 May; 25(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 7083079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.