186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35517991)
1. The Function Improved of the Newly Designed Magnetic-End Ureteric Stenting Retrieval Device: A Clinical Prospective Randomized and Control Trial in a Multicenter Study.
Zeng S; Liu B; Hu H; Shi J; Qian P; Zhang X; Peng K; Yang S; Huang Z; Pan T
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():4107491. PubMed ID: 35517991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ureteric stenting with magnetic retrieval: an alternative to traditional methods.
O'Kelly JA; Haroon UM; Rauf AJ; Breen KJ; McGuire BB; Cheema IA; McLornan L; Forde JC
Ir J Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 189(1):289-293. PubMed ID: 31418152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of magnetic versus conventional ureteric stents for short term ureteric stenting.
Lyons L; Kinnear N; Hennessey D
Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Dec; 191(6):2763-2769. PubMed ID: 35064536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic Ureteral Stent Removal Without Cystoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rassweiler MC; Michel MS; Ritter M; Honeck P
J Endourol; 2017 Aug; 31(8):762-766. PubMed ID: 28478732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of pain perception associated with use of the magnetic-end ureteric double-J stent for short-term ureteric stenting.
Sevcenco S; Eredics K; Lusuardi L; Klingler HC
World J Urol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):475-479. PubMed ID: 29236163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and effectiveness of magnetic ureteric stent removal under ultrasound control: a randomized single center trial.
Li J; Gauhar V; Lim EJ; Dmitriy S; Vladimir O; Dmitriy G; Igor S; Gadzhiev N
World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):2889-2896. PubMed ID: 37243718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a magnetic retrieval device vs. flexible cystoscopy for removal of ureteral stents in renal transplant patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Kapoor A; Akerman J; Wong ECL; Vasisth G; Hassan F; Tajzler C; Piercey K; Hoogenes J; Lambe S
Can Urol Assoc J; 2021 Feb; 15(2):E97-E102. PubMed ID: 32745000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of ureteral stent removal by flexible cystoscopy on pain and satisfaction in young males: a prospective randomised control trial.
Jeong YB; Doo AR; Park HS; Shin YS
Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 26520434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does mirabegron relieve ureteric stent-related discomfort? A prospective, randomized, multicentre study.
Tae BS; Cho S; Jeon BJ; Choi H; Park JY; Cho SY; Lee KC; Bae JH
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):866-872. PubMed ID: 29802800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and safety of magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent insertion and removal in children.
Chalhoub M; Kohaut J; Vinit N; Botto N; Aigrain Y; Héloury Y; Lottmann H; Blanc T
World J Urol; 2021 May; 39(5):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32623499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of ureteral stent type on patient symptoms as determined by the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Park HK; Paick SH; Kim HG; Lho YS; Bae S
J Endourol; 2015 Mar; 29(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 25153249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of tamsulosin hydrochloride in relieving "double-J ureteral stent-related morbidity": a randomized placebo controlled clinical study.
Singh I; Tripathy S; Agrawal V
Int Urol Nephrol; 2014 Dec; 46(12):2279-83. PubMed ID: 25201459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MAGnetic REtriaval Device for Minimally Invasive Ureter Stent Removal.
Stankovic M; Wolff L; Wieder T; Mendes J; Schumacher B
J Endourol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38780804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.
Lai D; Chen M; Zha S; Wan S
BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 28431538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic Stent Removal in a Nurse Led Clinic; a Nine Month Experience.
O'Connell L; Broe MP; Rooney D; Elhag S; Cheema I; McGuire BB
Ir Med J; 2018 Feb; 111(2):687. PubMed ID: 29952436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ureteral stent retrieval using the crochet hook technique in females.
Kawahara T; Ito H; Terao H; Yamagishi T; Ogawa T; Uemura H; Kubota Y; Matsuzaki J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e29292. PubMed ID: 22235282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ureteral stent removal using an extraction string after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: a cost-benefit analysis.
Liu H; Pan W; Zhang N
Urol J; 2018 Nov; 15(6):329-332. PubMed ID: 30251748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial investigating clinical outcomes and stent-related symptoms after placement of a complete intra-ureteric stent on a string versus conventional stent placement.
Shah M; Pillai S; Chawla A; de la Rosette JJMCH; Laguna P; Jayadeva Reddy S; Taori R; Hegde P; Mummalaneni S
BJU Int; 2022 Mar; 129(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 34245667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the forces needed for ureteral stent removal: Initial evaluation of magnetic stent removal devices on benchtop and porcine models.
Sheth KR; White JT; Puttmann K; Waters D; Soto M; Bell M; Aboufadel T; Heffernan MJ; Richardson E; Song SH; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Oct; 16(5):596.e1-596.e8. PubMed ID: 32340884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study.
Kim DJ; Son JH; Jang SH; Lee JW; Cho DS; Lim CH
BMC Urol; 2015 Dec; 15():121. PubMed ID: 26653027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
