These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35522652)

  • 1. Systematic heterogenisation to improve reproducibility in animal studies.
    Suman PR; Lino de Oliveira C
    PLoS Biol; 2022 May; 20(5):e3001629. PubMed ID: 35522652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies?
    von Kortzfleisch VT; Ambrée O; Karp NA; Meyer N; Novak J; Palme R; Rosso M; Touma C; Würbel H; Kaiser S; Sachser N; Richter SH
    PLoS Biol; 2022 May; 20(5):e3001564. PubMed ID: 35511779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving reproducibility in animal research by splitting the study population into several 'mini-experiments'.
    von Kortzfleisch VT; Karp NA; Palme R; Kaiser S; Sachser N; Richter SH
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16579. PubMed ID: 33024165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogenising study samples across testing time improves reproducibility of behavioural data.
    Bodden C; von Kortzfleisch VT; Karwinkel F; Kaiser S; Sachser N; Richter SH
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8247. PubMed ID: 31160667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias in laboratory animal research: a survey on magnitude, drivers, consequences and potential solutions.
    ter Riet G; Korevaar DA; Leenaars M; Sterk PJ; Van Noorden CJ; Bouter LM; Lutter R; Elferink RP; Hooft L
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43404. PubMed ID: 22957028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of population heterogenization on the reproducibility of mouse behavior: a multi-laboratory study.
    Richter SH; Garner JP; Zipser B; Lewejohann L; Sachser N; Touma C; Schindler B; Chourbaji S; Brandwein C; Gass P; van Stipdonk N; van der Harst J; Spruijt B; Võikar V; Wolfer DP; Würbel H
    PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e16461. PubMed ID: 21305027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Animal experimentation: implementation and application of the 3Rs.
    Lewis DI
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2019 Nov; 3(6):675-679. PubMed ID: 32915219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews of animal studies; missing link in translational research?
    van Luijk J; Bakker B; Rovers MM; Ritskes-Hoitinga M; de Vries RB; Leenaars M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e89981. PubMed ID: 24670965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic heterogenization revisited: Increasing variation in animal experiments to improve reproducibility?
    von Kortzfleisch VT; Richter SH
    J Neurosci Methods; 2024 Jan; 401():109992. PubMed ID: 37884081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic heterogenization for better reproducibility in animal experimentation.
    Richter SH
    Lab Anim (NY); 2017 Aug; 46(9):343-349. PubMed ID: 29296016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential for unintended consequences of environmental enrichment for laboratory animals and research results.
    Bayne K
    ILAR J; 2005; 46(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15775022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of weaning age and housing conditions on phenotypic differences in mice.
    Bailoo JD; Voelkl B; Varholick J; Novak J; Murphy E; Rosso M; Palme R; Würbel H
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11684. PubMed ID: 32669633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments.
    Richter SH; Garner JP; Auer C; Kunert J; Würbel H
    Nat Methods; 2010 Mar; 7(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 20195246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?
    Jonker RM; Guenther A; Engqvist L; Schmoll T
    Nat Methods; 2013 May; 10(5):373. PubMed ID: 23629411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Web tool aims to reduce flaws in animal studies.
    Cressey D
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7592):128. PubMed ID: 26949773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An initiative to facilitate well-informed decision-making in laboratory animal research: report of the First International Symposium on Systematic Reviews in Laboratory Animal Science.
    Hooijmans CR; Rovers M; de Vries RB; Leenaars M; Ritskes-Hoitinga M
    Lab Anim; 2012 Oct; 46(4):356-7. PubMed ID: 22969143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal Welfare.
    Carbone L; Austin J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155001. PubMed ID: 27171143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Handful of Details to Ensure the Experimental Reproducibility on the FORCED Running Wheel in Rodents: A Systematic Review.
    Garrigos D; Martínez-Morga M; Toval A; Kutsenko Y; Barreda A; Do Couto BR; Navarro-Mateu F; Ferran JL
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():638261. PubMed ID: 34040580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No clear trends in expatriation of non-human primate research from -Switzerland between 2004 and 2017.
    Sousa FM; Berezowski J; Rüegg SR
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2021 Sep; 163(9):553-563. PubMed ID: 34465559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Animal experiments in biomedical research. An evaluation of the clinical relevance of approved animal experimental projects].
    Lindl T; Voelkel M; Kolar R
    ALTEX; 2005; 22(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 16186990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.