These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35523145)

  • 1. Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German.
    Rissman L; van Putten S; Majid A
    Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 46(5):e13140. PubMed ID: 35523145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dissociation between conceptual prominence and explicit category learning: Evidence from agent and patient event roles.
    Rissman L; Lupyan G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1707-1732. PubMed ID: 34766824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using instruments to understand argument structure: Evidence for gradient representation.
    Rissman L; Rawlins K; Landau B
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():266-90. PubMed ID: 26057832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grounded Cognition Entails Linguistic Relativity: Response to Commentators.
    Kemmerer D
    Top Cogn Sci; 2023 Oct; 15(4):698-708. PubMed ID: 37534415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linguistic Distributional Knowledge and Sensorimotor Grounding both Contribute to Semantic Category Production.
    Banks B; Wingfield C; Connell L
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Oct; 45(10):e13055. PubMed ID: 34647346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Core features: measures and characterization for different languages.
    Vivas L; Montefinese M; Bolognesi M; Vivas J
    Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):651-667. PubMed ID: 32333125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16526952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Representing agents, patients, goals and instruments in causative events: A cross-linguistic investigation of early language and cognition.
    Ünal E; Richards C; Trueswell JC; Papafragou A
    Dev Sci; 2021 Nov; 24(6):e13116. PubMed ID: 33955664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts?
    Saalbach H; Imai M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 17696695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Understanding' differs between English and German: Capturing systematic language differences of complex words.
    Günther F; Smolka E; Marelli M
    Cortex; 2019 Jul; 116():168-175. PubMed ID: 30348446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From a Grammaticality Judgment Study of Indonesian.
    Aryawibawa IN; Ambridge B
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):3135-3148. PubMed ID: 30375023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event parsing and the origins of grammar.
    Zuberbühler K
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 13(3):e1587. PubMed ID: 34929755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 9():55. PubMed ID: 18588672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No grammatical gender effect on affective ratings: evidence from Italian and German languages.
    Montefinese M; Ambrosini E; Roivainen E
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Jun; 33(4):848-854. PubMed ID: 29873624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Events and objects are similar cognitive entities.
    Papafragou A; Ji Y
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Jun; 143():101573. PubMed ID: 37178616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bridging the Chasm Between Cognitive Representations and Formal Structures of Linguistic Meanings.
    Mondal P
    Cogn Sci; 2024 May; 48(5):e13456. PubMed ID: 38804002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classifier categories reflect but do not affect conceptual organization.
    Speed LJ; Chen J; Huettig F; Majid A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(4):625-640. PubMed ID: 33151714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.
    Gattei CA; Dickey MW; Wainselboim AJ; París L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1981-2007. PubMed ID: 25529525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One Label or Two? Linguistic Influences on the Similarity Judgment of Objects between English and Japanese Speakers.
    Masuda T; Ishii K; Miwa K; Rashid M; Lee H; Mahdi R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1637. PubMed ID: 29018375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cross-linguistic examination of the noun-category bias: its existence and specificity in French- and Spanish-speaking preschool-aged children.
    Waxman SR; Senghas A; Benveniste S
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Apr; 32(3):183-218. PubMed ID: 9125905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.