These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35523378)

  • 1. Clinical extension of proximal carious lesions compared to bitewing radiographs using photostimulable phosphor plates (PSP).
    Khalaf ME; Baghdadi MT; Faridoun AE; Alshawaf NM; Qudeimat MA
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104145. PubMed ID: 35523378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions: An in vitro study.
    Ruiz DC; Farias-Gomes A; Fontenele RC; Gaêta-Araujo H; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Groppo FC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 135(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 36566136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of clinical axial extension of Class II caries lesions with ultraspeed and digital radiographs: an in-vivo study.
    Bin-Shuwaish M; Dennison JB; Yaman P; Neiva G
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 19051853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grey levels and radiolucent lesion depth as cavity predictors for approximal dentin caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Mariath AA; Casagrande L; de Araujo FB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):377-81. PubMed ID: 17881594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of the DIAGNOcam and bitewing radiographs in the diagnosis of cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars.
    Alamoudi NM; Khan JA; El-Ashiry EA; Felemban OM; Bagher SM; Al-Tuwirqi AA
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1576-1582. PubMed ID: 31719280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of enamel-dentin caries lesions detection using bitewing PSP digital images.
    Torres MG; Santos Ada S; Neves FS; Arriaga ML; Campos PS; Crusoé-Rebello I
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):462-8. PubMed ID: 21986650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo study.
    Baltacioglu IH; Orhan K
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):130. PubMed ID: 29145846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the effects of postprocessing settings in digital bitewing radiographs on proximal caries detection.
    Abdinian M; Keshani F; Sadeghi F; Soltani P; Spagnuolo G; Rengo C
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e889. PubMed ID: 38712390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentists' variability in restorative decisions, microscopic and radiographic caries depth.
    Lewis DW; Kay EJ; Main PA; Pharoah MG; Csima A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Apr; 24(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 8654029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restorative certainty and varying perceptions of dental caries depth among dentists.
    Lewis DW; Pharoah MJ; El-Mowafy O; Ross DG
    J Public Health Dent; 1997; 57(4):243-5. PubMed ID: 9558628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional diagnostic value of digital bitewing radiographs in detecting proximal caries in primary molars.
    Madiraju G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Sep; 32(7):E115-9. PubMed ID: 23738994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of remaining dentine thickness below deep lesions of caries.
    Lancaster PE; Craddock HL; Carmichael FA
    Br Dent J; 2011 Nov; 211(10):E20. PubMed ID: 22116253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.