These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35523973)

  • 21. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double button device: Clinical and MRI results.
    Loriaut P; Casabianca L; Alkhaili J; Dallaudière B; Desportes E; Rousseau R; Massin P; Boyer P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 26545942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results.
    Çarkçı E; Polat AE; Gürpınar T
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Apr; 15(1):136. PubMed ID: 32268914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.
    Feichtinger X; Dahm F; Schallmayer D; Boesmueller S; Fialka C; Mittermayr R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 32748232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of acute and chronic AC joint separations].
    Braun S; Martetschläger F; Imhoff AB
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2014 Jun; 26(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 24924503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early and delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction provide equivalent outcomes.
    Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Collin P; Cau JBC; Van Rooij F; Piotton S
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Mar; 30(3):635-640. PubMed ID: 32650071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is coracoclavicular stabilisation alone sufficient for the endoscopic treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types III, IV, and V)?
    Barth J; Duparc F; Andrieu K; Duport M; Toussaint B; Bertiaux S; Clavert P; Gastaud O; Brassart N; Beaudouin E; De Mourgues P; Berne D; Bahurel J; Najihi N; Boyer P; Faivre B; Meyer A; Nourissat G; Poulain S; Bruchou F; Ménard JF;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8 Suppl):S297-303. PubMed ID: 26514849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Superior clinical results for early arthroscopic treatment of grade IIIb and V acromioclavicular joint instability compared to delayed operative treatment.
    Dey Hazra RO; Hanhoff M; Kühnapfel A; Rutledge JC; Warnhoff M; Ellwein A; Lill H; Jensen G
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1185-1195. PubMed ID: 36584871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction.
    Metzlaff S; Rosslenbroich S; Forkel PH; Schliemann B; Arshad H; Raschke M; Petersen W
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jun; 24(6):1972-8. PubMed ID: 25209209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
    Shin SJ; Kim NK
    Arthroscopy; 2015 May; 31(5):816-24. PubMed ID: 25543250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Yin J; Yin Z; Gong G; Zhu C; Sun C; Liu X
    Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):18-23. PubMed ID: 29679723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and navigation-assisted two tunnel technique for coracoclavicular ligament augmentation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
    Theopold J; Henkelmann R; Zhang C; Schöbel T; Osterhoff G; Hepp P
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jun; 22(1):528. PubMed ID: 34107940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Iatrogenic instability of the acromioclavicular joint leads to ongoing impairment of shoulder function even following secondary surgical stabilization.
    Geyer S; Achtnich AE; Voss A; Berthold DP; Lutz PM; Imhoff AB; Martetschläger F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Apr; 143(4):1877-1886. PubMed ID: 35220484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative study of two different horizontal stabilisation methods in arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular stabilisation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations-Good clinical outcome and no correlation to recurrent anteroposterior instability.
    Kimmeyer M; Rapp K; Rentschler V; Schieffer C; Schmalzl J; Christian G; Lars-Johannes L
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39033339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mini-open vs. arthroscopic double tight-rope reconstruction after acute AC-joint dislocation: a comparison in functional outcome and sports activity.
    Koch M; Werner A; Engel G; Huth J; Mauch F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Sep; 143(9):5491-5500. PubMed ID: 36943502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implant-dependent behavior of tunnel widening and clavicular button migration after arthroscopic-assisted treatment of acromioclavicular joint instabilities.
    Dey Hazra RO; El Bajjati H; Hanhoff M; Warnhoff M; Ellwein A; Fossum BW; Lill H; Jensen G
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Aug; 33(6):2533-2540. PubMed ID: 36596884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute injury to the acromioclavicular joint with the double TightRope™ technique: one-year results].
    Gerhardt C; Kraus N; Pauly S; Scheibel M
    Unfallchirurg; 2013 Feb; 116(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 21766203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomic reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: 58-month findings.
    Venjakob AJ; Salzmann GM; Gabel F; Buchmann S; Walz L; Spang JT; Vogt S; Imhoff AB
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Mar; 41(3):615-21. PubMed ID: 23371472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term stability of coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint separation.
    Panagopoulos A; Fandridis E; Rose GD; Ranieri R; Castagna A; Kokkalis ZT; Dimakopoulos P
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2103-2109. PubMed ID: 32691091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by coracoclavicular ligament augmentation.
    Liu X; Huangfu X; Zhao J
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 May; 23(5):1460-1466. PubMed ID: 24318508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Arthroscopic-Assisted Double-Bundle Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tape Provides Superior Vertical Stability Than the Single-Bundle Reconstruction for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.
    Park I; Lee S; Shin SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2023 Feb; 39(2):213-221. PubMed ID: 36210032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.