BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35524123)

  • 21. Standardization approaches in absolute quantitative proteomics with mass spectrometry.
    Calderón-Celis F; Encinar JR; Sanz-Medel A
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2018 Nov; 37(6):715-737. PubMed ID: 28758227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. WaveletQuant, an improved quantification software based on wavelet signal threshold de-noising for labeled quantitative proteomic analysis.
    Mo F; Mo Q; Chen Y; Goodlett DR; Hood L; Omenn GS; Li S; Lin B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11():219. PubMed ID: 20429928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SILVER: an efficient tool for stable isotope labeling LC-MS data quantitative analysis with quality control methods.
    Chang C; Zhang J; Han M; Ma J; Zhang W; Wu S; Liu K; Xie H; He F; Zhu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):586-7. PubMed ID: 24344194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ.
    Cox J; Hein MY; Luber CA; Paron I; Nagaraj N; Mann M
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2014 Sep; 13(9):2513-26. PubMed ID: 24942700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast.
    de Godoy LM; Olsen JV; Cox J; Nielsen ML; Hubner NC; Fröhlich F; Walther TC; Mann M
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7217):1251-4. PubMed ID: 18820680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of full versus partial metabolic labeling for quantitative proteomics analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Huttlin EL; Hegeman AD; Harms AC; Sussman MR
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 May; 6(5):860-81. PubMed ID: 17293592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of empirical rule of linearly correlated peptide selection (ERLPS) for proteotypic peptide-based quantitative proteomics.
    Liu K; Zhang J; Fu B; Xie H; Wang Y; Qian X
    Proteomics; 2014 Jul; 14(13-14):1593-603. PubMed ID: 24827140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiplexed quantification for data-independent acquisition.
    Minogue CE; Hebert AS; Rensvold JW; Westphall MS; Pagliarini DJ; Coon JJ
    Anal Chem; 2015 Mar; 87(5):2570-5. PubMed ID: 25621425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Toward improved peptide feature detection in quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling.
    Nilse L; Sigloch FC; Biniossek ML; Schilling O
    Proteomics Clin Appl; 2015 Aug; 9(7-8):706-14. PubMed ID: 25931027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mascot file parsing and quantification (MFPaQ), a new software to parse, validate, and quantify proteomics data generated by ICAT and SILAC mass spectrometric analyses: application to the proteomics study of membrane proteins from primary human endothelial cells.
    Bouyssié D; Gonzalez de Peredo A; Mouton E; Albigot R; Roussel L; Ortega N; Cayrol C; Burlet-Schiltz O; Girard JP; Monsarrat B
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Sep; 6(9):1621-37. PubMed ID: 17533220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. iTRAQ-Based Shotgun Proteomics Approach for Relative Protein Quantification.
    Núñez EV; Domont GB; Nogueira FCS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1546():267-274. PubMed ID: 27896776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of carbon-13 and deuterium on relative quantification of proteins using stable isotope diethyl labeling.
    Koehler CJ; Arntzen MØ; Thiede B
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2015 May; 29(9):830-6. PubMed ID: 26377011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recent advances in isobaric labeling and applications in quantitative proteomics.
    Sivanich MK; Gu TJ; Tabang DN; Li L
    Proteomics; 2022 Oct; 22(19-20):e2100256. PubMed ID: 35687565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combination of online enzyme digestion with stable isotope labeling for high-throughput quantitative proteome analysis.
    Wang F; Wei X; Zhou H; Liu J; Figeys D; Zou H
    Proteomics; 2012 Nov; 12(21):3129-37. PubMed ID: 22945397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ICPL labeling strategies for proteome research.
    Lottspeich F; Kellermann J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():55-64. PubMed ID: 21604115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. UNiquant, a program for quantitative proteomics analysis using stable isotope labeling.
    Huang X; Tolmachev AV; Shen Y; Liu M; Huang L; Zhang Z; Anderson GA; Smith RD; Chan WC; Hinrichs SH; Fu K; Ding SJ
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Mar; 10(3):1228-37. PubMed ID: 21158445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hyperplexing: a method for higher-order multiplexed quantitative proteomics provides a map of the dynamic response to rapamycin in yeast.
    Dephoure N; Gygi SP
    Sci Signal; 2012 Mar; 5(217):rs2. PubMed ID: 22457332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic evaluation of label-free and super-SILAC quantification for proteome expression analysis.
    Tebbe A; Klammer M; Sighart S; Schaab C; Daub H
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2015 May; 29(9):795-801. PubMed ID: 26377007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development and application of proteomics technologies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Kolkman A; Slijper M; Heck AJ
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 23(12):598-604. PubMed ID: 16202464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative Evaluation of MaxQuant and Proteome Discoverer MS1-Based Protein Quantification Tools.
    Palomba A; Abbondio M; Fiorito G; Uzzau S; Pagnozzi D; Tanca A
    J Proteome Res; 2021 Jul; 20(7):3497-3507. PubMed ID: 34038140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.