145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35524123)
41. Systematic evaluation of label-free and super-SILAC quantification for proteome expression analysis.
Tebbe A; Klammer M; Sighart S; Schaab C; Daub H
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2015 May; 29(9):795-801. PubMed ID: 26377007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Hyperplexing: a method for higher-order multiplexed quantitative proteomics provides a map of the dynamic response to rapamycin in yeast.
Dephoure N; Gygi SP
Sci Signal; 2012 Mar; 5(217):rs2. PubMed ID: 22457332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Chemical isotope labeling for quantitative proteomics.
Tian X; Permentier HP; Bischoff R
Mass Spectrom Rev; 2023 Mar; 42(2):546-576. PubMed ID: 34091937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Amino acid residue specific stable isotope labeling for quantitative proteomics.
Zhu H; Pan S; Gu S; Bradbury EM; Chen X
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2002; 16(22):2115-23. PubMed ID: 12415544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative Evaluation of Proteome Discoverer and FragPipe for the TMT-Based Proteome Quantification.
He T; Liu Y; Zhou Y; Li L; Wang H; Chen S; Gao J; Jiang W; Yu Y; Ge W; Chang HY; Fan Z; Nesvizhskii AI; Guo T; Sun Y
J Proteome Res; 2022 Dec; 21(12):3007-3015. PubMed ID: 36315902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An assessment of false discovery rates and statistical significance in label-free quantitative proteomics with combined filters.
Li Q; Roxas BA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():43. PubMed ID: 19187558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Latest developments in sample treatment for 18O-isotopic labeling for proteomics mass spectrometry-based approaches: a critical review.
Capelo JL; Carreira RJ; Fernandes L; Lodeiro C; Santos HM; Simal-Gandara J
Talanta; 2010 Feb; 80(4):1476-86. PubMed ID: 20082805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Thermo-msf-parser: an open source Java library to parse and visualize Thermo Proteome Discoverer msf files.
Colaert N; Barsnes H; Vaudel M; Helsens K; Timmerman E; Sickmann A; Gevaert K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Aug; 10(8):3840-3. PubMed ID: 21714566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. LFQProfiler and RNP(xl): Open-Source Tools for Label-Free Quantification and Protein-RNA Cross-Linking Integrated into Proteome Discoverer.
Veit J; Sachsenberg T; Chernev A; Aicheler F; Urlaub H; Kohlbacher O
J Proteome Res; 2016 Sep; 15(9):3441-8. PubMed ID: 27476824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A new sample preparation method for the absolute quantitation of a target proteome using (18)O labeling combined with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry.
Li J; Zhou L; Wang H; Yan H; Li N; Zhai R; Jiao F; Hao F; Jin Z; Tian F; Peng B; Zhang Y; Qian X
Analyst; 2015 Feb; 140(4):1281-90. PubMed ID: 25568899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics.
Pappireddi N; Martin L; Wühr M
Chembiochem; 2019 May; 20(10):1210-1224. PubMed ID: 30609196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. SILAC-Based Quantitative Phosphoproteomics in Yeast.
Hernáez ML; Gil C
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2603():103-115. PubMed ID: 36370273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Coisolation of Peptide Pairs for Peptide Identification and MS/MS-Based Quantification.
Smith IR; Eng JK; Barente AS; Hogrebe A; Llovet A; Rodriguez-Mias RA; Villén J
Anal Chem; 2022 Nov; 94(44):15198-15206. PubMed ID: 36306373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Global absolute quantification of a proteome: Challenges in the deployment of a QconCAT strategy.
Brownridge P; Holman SW; Gaskell SJ; Grant CM; Harman VM; Hubbard SJ; Lanthaler K; Lawless C; O'Cualain R; Sims P; Watkins R; Beynon RJ
Proteomics; 2011 Aug; 11(15):2957-70. PubMed ID: 21710569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparing SILAC- and stable isotope dimethyl-labeling approaches for quantitative proteomics.
Lau HT; Suh HW; Golkowski M; Ong SE
J Proteome Res; 2014 Sep; 13(9):4164-74. PubMed ID: 25077673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A Triple Knockout (TKO) Proteomics Standard for Diagnosing Ion Interference in Isobaric Labeling Experiments.
Paulo JA; O'Connell JD; Gygi SP
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1620-5. PubMed ID: 27400695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Quantitative Translation Proteomics Using mePROD.
Klann K; Münch C
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2428():75-87. PubMed ID: 35171474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Identification and quantification of protein carbonylation using light and heavy isotope labeled Girard's P reagent.
Mirzaei H; Regnier F
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Nov; 1134(1-2):122-33. PubMed ID: 16996067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessing biological variation and protein processing in primary human leukocytes by automated multiplex stable isotope labeling coupled to 2 dimensional peptide separation.
Raijmakers R; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
Mol Biosyst; 2009 Sep; 5(9):992-1003. PubMed ID: 19668865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A study of reproducibility of guanidination-dimethylation labeling and liquid chromatography matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry for relative proteome quantification.
Ji C; Zhang N; Damaraju S; Damaraju VL; Carpenter P; Cass CE; Li L
Anal Chim Acta; 2007 Mar; 585(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 17386668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
