137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35526346)
1. In-plane and out-of-plane deformations of gilt utero-sacral ligaments.
Donaldson K; Thomas J; Zhu Y; Clark-Deener S; Alperin M; De Vita R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jul; 131():105249. PubMed ID: 35526346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical Analysis of the Uterosacral Ligament: Swine vs. Human.
Baah-Dwomoh A; Alperin M; Cook M; De Vita R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2036-2047. PubMed ID: 30051246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of repeated biaxial loads on the creep properties of cardinal ligaments.
Baah-Dwomoh A; De Vita R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():128-141. PubMed ID: 28599153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanics of Uterosacral Ligaments: Current Knowledge, Existing Gaps, and Future Directions.
Donaldson K; Huntington A; De Vita R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Aug; 49(8):1788-1804. PubMed ID: 33754254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biaxial mechanical properties of swine uterosacral and cardinal ligaments.
Becker WR; De Vita R
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):549-60. PubMed ID: 25218641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ex Vivo Uniaxial Tensile Properties of Rat Uterosacral Ligaments.
Donaldson K; De Vita R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 51(4):702-714. PubMed ID: 36652028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Biaxial Biomechanical Properties of Post-menopausal Human Prolapsed and Non-prolapsed Uterosacral Ligament.
Danso EK; Schuster JD; Johnson I; Harville EW; Buckner LR; Desrosiers L; Knoepp LR; Miller KS
Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7386. PubMed ID: 32355180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Micro-structural and Biaxial Creep Properties of the Swine Uterosacral-Cardinal Ligament Complex.
Tan T; Cholewa NM; Case SW; De Vita R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Nov; 44(11):3225-3237. PubMed ID: 27256362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of short-term moderate ZEN consumption on uterosacral ligament elasticity in pubertal gilts.
Pack E; Stewart J; Rhoads M; Knight J; Clark S; Schmale DG; De Vita R
Res Vet Sci; 2020 Dec; 133():202-209. PubMed ID: 33011603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolation and Characterization of the Murine Uterosacral Ligaments and Pelvic Floor Organs.
Bastías CS; Savard LM; Eckstein KN; Connell K; Luetkemeyer CM; Ferguson VL; Calve S
J Vis Exp; 2023 Mar; (193):. PubMed ID: 36939242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supramolecular Fibrous Hydrogel Augmentation of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Miller B; Wolfe W; Gentry JL; Grewal MG; Highley CB; De Vita R; Vaughan MH; Caliari SR
Adv Healthc Mater; 2023 Sep; 12(22):e2300086. PubMed ID: 37220996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal ultrasound features of normal uterosacral ligaments.
Savelli L; Ambrosio M; Salucci P; Raimondo D; Arena A; Seracchioli R
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):275-277. PubMed ID: 33583595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beta-3 adrenoceptor expression in the uterosacral ligament in the postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Chong W; Fantl JA; Donovan M; Ascher-Walsh C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2135-2140. PubMed ID: 29635716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap.
Easley DC; Abramowitch SD; Moalli PA
Curr Opin Urol; 2017 May; 27(3):262-267. PubMed ID: 28267057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel transvaginal approach to correct recurrent apical prolapse after failed sacral colpopexy: case series.
Bracken JN; Tran DH; Kuehl TJ; Larsen W; Yandell PM; Shull BL
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1429-33. PubMed ID: 22527557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mesh anchoring technique in uterine prolapse repair surgery: A finite element analysis.
Silva MET; Bessa JNM; Parente MPL; Mascarenhas T; Natal Jorge RM; Fernandes AA
J Biomech; 2021 Oct; 127():110649. PubMed ID: 34375905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HOXA11 promotes fibroblast proliferation and regulates p53 in uterosacral ligaments.
Connell KA; Guess MK; Chen HW; Lynch T; Bercik R; Taylor HS
Reprod Sci; 2009 Jul; 16(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 19372592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Smith BC; Crisp CC; Kleeman SD; Yook E; Pauls RN
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 30807407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
