These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3552659)

  • 1. Three protocols for measuring subcutaneous fat thickness on the upper extremities.
    Weiss LW; Clark FC
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1987; 56(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 3552659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
    Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic protocols for separately measuring subcutaneous fat and skeletal muscle thickness in the calf area.
    Weiss LW; Clark FC
    Phys Ther; 1985 Apr; 65(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 3885268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skinfold compressibility in Japanese university students.
    Hattori K; Okamoto W
    Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn; 1993 Aug; 70(2-3):69-77. PubMed ID: 8247474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
    Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness.
    Borkan GA; Hults DE; Cardarelli J; Burrows BA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1982 Jul; 58(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 7124924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
    Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
    Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
    Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
    Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subcutaneous fat distribution of the abdomen and buttocks in Japanese women aged 20 to 58 years.
    Murakami M; Arai S; Nagai Y; Yamazaki K; Iizuka S
    Appl Human Sci; 1997 Jul; 16(4):167-77. PubMed ID: 9343866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound images.
    Ramirez ME
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 1485642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subcutaneous fat alterations resulting from an upper-body resistance training program.
    Kostek MA; Pescatello LS; Seip RL; Angelopoulos TJ; Clarkson PM; Gordon PM; Moyna NM; Visich PS; Zoeller RF; Thompson PD; Hoffman EP; Price TB
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Jul; 39(7):1177-85. PubMed ID: 17596787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
    Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subcutaneous thigh fat assessment: a comparison of skinfold calipers and ultrasound imaging.
    Selkow NM; Pietrosimone BG; Saliba SA
    J Athl Train; 2011; 46(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 21214350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
    Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
    Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic and skinfold caliper measures of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in elderly men and women.
    Chumlea WC; Roche AF
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 3544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
    Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Anthropometric and nutritional study in young adults. Evaluation of submandibular skinfold thickness].
    Fleta Zaragozano J; Moreno Aznar L; Rodríguez García L; Rodríguez Martínez G; Lario Elboj A
    Nutr Hosp; 1999; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10361811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sub-cutaneous fat thickness measured by magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and calipers.
    Hayes PA; Sowood PJ; Belyavin A; Cohen JB; Smith FW
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1988 Jun; 20(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 3386511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a Sub-set of Skinfold Sites for Ultrasound Measurement of Subcutaneous Adiposity and Percentage Body Fat Estimation in Athletes.
    O'Neill DC; Cronin O; O'Neill SB; Woods T; Keohane DM; Molloy MG; Falvey EC
    Int J Sports Med; 2016 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 26859645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percentile curves for skinfold thickness in 7- to 14-year-old children and adolescents from Jena, Germany.
    Kromeyer-Hauschild K; Glässer N; Zellner K
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2012 May; 66(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 22252105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.