These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35526955)
1. Computed Tomography Imaging Artifacts in the Head and Neck Region: Pitfalls and Solutions. Marshall EL; Ginat DT; Sammet S Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2022 May; 32(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 35526955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical applications of dual-energy CT in head and neck imaging. Ginat DT; Mayich M; Daftari-Besheli L; Gupta R Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 273(3):547-53. PubMed ID: 25472819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atlas of confounding factors in head and neck PET/CT imaging. Bhargava P; Rahman S; Wendt J Clin Nucl Med; 2011 May; 36(5):e20-9. PubMed ID: 21467845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of orthopedic metal artifact reduction software on interreader variability when delineating areas of interest in the head and neck. Kohan AA; Rubbert C; Vercher-Conejero JL; Partovi S; Sher A; Kolthammer JA; Wojtylak P; Ellis RJ; O'Donnell JK Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(4):e309-15. PubMed ID: 25666990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Right arm injection of contrast medium reduces venous artifacts in head and neck multislice spiral computed tomography angiography. Fang H; Song YL; Li XS; Bi YM; Wang P; Fan HX; Meng LM; Hu HX Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Dec; 19(24):4698-702. PubMed ID: 26744859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of iterative metal artifact reduction on diagnostic image quality in patients with dental hardware. Weiß J; Schabel C; Bongers M; Raupach R; Clasen S; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Bamberg F Acta Radiol; 2017 Mar; 58(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 27166346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Metal artefact on head and neck cone-beam CT images]. Kovacs M; Fejérdy P; Dobó NC Fogorv Sz; 2008 Oct; 101(5):171-8. PubMed ID: 19039918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR Imaging Artifacts in the Head and Neck Region: Pitfalls and Solutions. Marshall EL; Ginat DT; Sammet S Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2022 May; 32(2):279-286. PubMed ID: 35526956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed Tomography of the Head and Neck Region for Tumor Staging-Comparison of Dual-Source, Dual-Energy and Low-Kilovolt, Single-Energy Acquisitions. May MS; Bruegel J; Brand M; Wiesmueller M; Krauss B; Allmendinger T; Uder M; Wuest W Invest Radiol; 2017 Sep; 52(9):522-528. PubMed ID: 28430715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Geometric and dosimetric impact of 3D generative adversarial network-based metal artifact reduction algorithm on VMAT and IMPT for the head and neck region. Nakamura M; Nakao M; Imanishi K; Hirashima H; Tsuruta Y Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 34092240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in the Head and Neck With Dual-Energy CT: Ready for Clinical Use? Timmer VCML; Kroonenburgh AMJLV; Henneman WJP; Vaassen LAA; Roele ED; Kessler PAWH; Postma AA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):893-899. PubMed ID: 32045307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Normalized metal artifact reduction in head and neck computed tomography. Lell MM; Meyer E; Kuefner MA; May MS; Raupach R; Uder M; Kachelriess M Invest Radiol; 2012 Jul; 47(7):415-21. PubMed ID: 22659592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perfusion and Permeability Imaging for Head and Neck Cancer: Theory, Acquisition, Postprocessing, and Relevance to Clinical Imaging. Davis AJ; Rehmani R; Srinivasan A; Fatterpekar GM Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2018 Feb; 26(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 29128004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of deblurring technique for improving the longitudinal resolution in helical CT of the head and neck region. Sakai O; Shen Y; Takata Y; Furuse M Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1997; 21(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 9258593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metal artifacts in patients with large dental implants and bridges: combination of metal artifact reduction algorithms and virtual monoenergetic images provides an approach to handle even strongest artifacts. Laukamp KR; Zopfs D; Lennartz S; Pennig L; Maintz D; Borggrefe J; Große Hokamp N Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4228-4238. PubMed ID: 30649598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical relevance of metal artefact reduction in computed tomography (iMAR) in the pelvic and head and neck region: Multi-institutional contouring study of gross tumour volumes and organs at risk on clinical cases. Hagen M; Kretschmer M; Würschmidt F; Gauer T; Giro C; Karsten E; Lorenzen J J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 63(6):842-851. PubMed ID: 31265214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic bone and plaque removal using dual energy CT for head and neck angiography: feasibility and initial performance evaluation. Thomas C; Korn A; Krauss B; Ketelsen D; Tsiflikas I; Reimann A; Brodoefel H; Claussen CD; Kopp AF; Ernemann U; Heuschmid M Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 19520534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient low-dose CT artifact mitigation using an artifact-matched prior scan. Xu W; Mueller K Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4748-60. PubMed ID: 22894400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation errors in CT angiography of the head and neck and the benefit of double reading. Lian K; Bharatha A; Aviv RI; Symons SP AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2011 Dec; 32(11):2132-5. PubMed ID: 21903915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]