These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35528047)

  • 1. Response Decoupling and Partisans' Evaluations of Politicians' Transgressions.
    Yair O; Schaffner BF
    Polit Behav; 2022 May; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 35528047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who sees which political falsehoods as more acceptable and why: A new look at in-group loyalty and trustworthiness.
    Galak J; Critcher CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Mar; 124(3):593-619. PubMed ID: 35708929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When racism and sexism benefit Black and female politicians: Politicians' ideology moderates prejudice's effect more than politicians' demographic background.
    Bai H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Jun; 120(6):1480-1520. PubMed ID: 32833465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Big Boys Don't Cry: Evaluations of Politicians Across Issue, Gender, and Emotion.
    Karl KL; Cormack L
    Polit Behav; 2023; 45(2):719-740. PubMed ID: 34188343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence.
    Mernyk JS; Pink SL; Druckman JN; Willer R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Apr; 119(16):e2116851119. PubMed ID: 35412915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deficit Attention Disorder: Partisanship, Issue Importance and Concern About Government Overspending.
    Kane JV; Anson IG
    Polit Behav; 2022 Mar; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 35250135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partisans' receptivity to persuasive messaging is undiminished by countervailing party leader cues.
    Tappin BM; Berinsky AJ; Rand DG
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 7(4):568-582. PubMed ID: 36864137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How (Not) to Talk on Twitter: Effects of Politicians' Tweets on Perceptions of the Twitter Environment.
    Lyons BA; Veenstra AS
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Jan; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26779660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partisan Stability During Turbulent Times: Evidence from Three American Panel Surveys.
    Green DP; Platzman P
    Polit Behav; 2022 Nov; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 36466772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Politicians' views on societal responsibility and possibility to promote newly arrived migrants' health in Sweden.
    Svanholm S; Carlerby H; Viitasara E
    Health Promot Int; 2023 Aug; 38(4):. PubMed ID: 34897484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Defensive: Identity, Language, and Partisan Reactions to Political Scandal.
    Ekstrom PD; Gonzales MH; Williams AL; Weiner E; Aguilera R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 May; ():1461672241247084. PubMed ID: 38708990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reactions to children's transgressions in at-risk caregivers: does mitigating information, type of transgression, or caregiver directive matter?
    Irwin LM; Skowronski JJ; Crouch JL; Milner JS; Zengel B
    Child Abuse Negl; 2014 May; 38(5):917-27. PubMed ID: 24075063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Belief in the Utility of Cross-Partisan Empathy Reduces Partisan Animosity and Facilitates Political Persuasion.
    Santos LA; Voelkel JG; Willer R; Zaki J
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1557-1573. PubMed ID: 36041234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Far away or yesterday? Shifting perceptions of time for political ends.
    Dawson AJ; Leith SA; Ward CLP; Williams S; Wilson AE
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277179. PubMed ID: 36327315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. They Saw a Hearing: Democrats' and Republicans' Perceptions of and Responses to the Ford-Kavanaugh Hearings.
    Grisham EL; Dashtgard P; Relihan DP; Holman EA; Silver RC
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; ():1461672231185605. PubMed ID: 37795702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judging scandal: Standards or bias in politics.
    Solomon ED; Hackathorn JM; Crittendon D
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 29565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Montagu Principle: Incivility decreases politicians' public approval, even with their political base.
    Frimer JA; Skitka LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 115(5):845-866. PubMed ID: 30124301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The politicians' perspectives on participation in mammographic screening: an interview-based study from a region in Sweden.
    Norfjord van Zyl M; Tillgren P; Asp M
    Arch Public Health; 2021 Apr; 79(1):52. PubMed ID: 33865449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians' twitter communication.
    Lee EJ; Shin SY
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2012 Oct; 15(10):515-20. PubMed ID: 22970827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why do I hate thee? Conflict misperceptions and intergroup mistrust.
    Chambers JR; Melnyk D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1295-311. PubMed ID: 16963602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.