These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35528047)

  • 21. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.
    Darius P
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Looking Competent Does Not Appeal to All Voters Equally: The Role of Social Class and Politicians' Facial Appearance for Voting Likelihood.
    Unkelbach F; Brütting T; Schilling N; Wänke M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; ():1461672231181465. PubMed ID: 37415550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Children's moral evaluations of reporting the transgressions of peers: age differences in evaluations of tattling.
    Loke IC; Heyman GD; Forgie J; McCarthy A; Lee K
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 47(6):1757-62. PubMed ID: 21910529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Asymmetric Partisan Voter Turnout Games.
    Guage C; Fu F
    Dyn Games Appl; 2021; 11(4):738-758. PubMed ID: 34760327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computational underpinnings of partisan information processing biases and associations with depth of cognitive reasoning.
    Derreumaux Y; Shamsian K; Hughes BL
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105304. PubMed ID: 36240612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptions of media influence and performance among politicians in European democracies.
    Maurer P
    Int Commun Gaz; 2023 Aug; 85(5):347-364. PubMed ID: 37564296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Polarizing cues.
    Nicholson SP
    Am J Pol Sci; 2012; 56(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 22400143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceiving politicians as true to themselves: Development and validation of the perceived political authenticity scale.
    Luebke SM; Engelmann I
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285344. PubMed ID: 37224107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correcting misperceptions of out-partisans decreases American legislators' support for undemocratic practices.
    Druckman JN; Kang S; Chu J; N Stagnaro M; Voelkel JG; Mernyk JS; Pink SL; Redekopp C; Rand DG; Willer R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(23):e2301836120. PubMed ID: 37252992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Partisan Contours of Attitudes About Rights and Liberties.
    Armaly MT; Enders AM
    Polit Behav; 2023 Jan; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 36743232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vaccinating across the aisle: using co-partisan source cues to encourage COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the ideological right.
    Sylvester S; Motta M; Trujillo KL; Callaghan T
    J Behav Med; 2023 Apr; 46(1-2):311-323. PubMed ID: 35543897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Partisanship and the Pandemic: How and Why Americans Followed Party Cues on COVID-19.
    Mehlhaff ID; Tarillo MC; Vanegas A; Hetherington MJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2024 Jun; 49(3):351-374. PubMed ID: 37988071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. #
    Mendiburo-Seguel A; Alenda S; Ford TE; Olah AR; Navia PD; Argüello-Gutiérrez C
    Front Sociol; 2022; 7():788742. PubMed ID: 35433924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States.
    Hersh E; Ghitza Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203997. PubMed ID: 30303974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audience perceptions of politicians' self-presentational behaviors concerning their own abilities.
    Schütz A
    J Soc Psychol; 1998 Apr; 138(2):173-88. PubMed ID: 9525093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physiological responses and partisan bias: beyond self-reported measures of party identification.
    Petersen MB; Giessing A; Nielsen J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126922. PubMed ID: 26010527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluations of moral and conventional intergroup transgressions.
    Mulvey KL
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 34(4):489-501. PubMed ID: 27130807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The fish can rot from the heart, not just the head: Exploring the detrimental impact of transgressions by leaders at multiple levels of an organization.
    Maskor M; Fladerer MP; Fong P; Steffens NK; Haslam SA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):431-455. PubMed ID: 35680638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.