129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35529283)
1. Comparison of clinical effectiveness of conventional and self-etch sealant: a split mouth randomized controlled trial.
Gupta D; Rao A; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS
F1000Res; 2022; 11():261. PubMed ID: 35529283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Erbas Unverdi G; Atac SA; Cehreli ZC
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
Khare M; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Nov; 27(6):444-453. PubMed ID: 28024165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Follow-up of a Fissure Sealant Placed Using Different Adhesive Protocols: A 24-month Split-mouth Study.
Yazici AR; Bayazit EO; Kutuk ZB; Ozgunaltay G; Ergin E; Berber A
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):362-371. PubMed ID: 29630489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention Evaluation of Fissure Sealants Applied Using Self-Etch and Conventional Acid-Etch Techniques: A Randomized Control Trial Among Schoolchildren.
Althomali YM; Musa S; Manan NM; Nor NAM
Pediatr Dent; 2022 Jul; 44(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 35999682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A 12-month clinical evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with and without etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in newly-erupted teeth.
Nogourani MK; Janghorbani M; Khadem P; Jadidi Z; Jalali S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 22858703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent molars affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial.
Özgür B; Kargın ST; Ölmez MS
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):275. PubMed ID: 35790955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioactive self-etching sealant on newly erupted molars: A split-mouth clinical trial.
Penha KJS; Roma FRVO; Filho EMM; Ribeiro CCC; Firoozmand LM
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103857. PubMed ID: 34699954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An
Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of successful outcome of pit and fissure sealants bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive and self-etch adhesive system.
Baloch JM; Ahmed MA; Syed AUY; Younus MZ; Nasim MO; Rashid S
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(5):1021-1027. PubMed ID: 34180435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Alsabek L; Al-Nerabieah Z; Bshara N; Comisi JC
J Dent; 2019 Jul; 86():69-74. PubMed ID: 31136817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Forss H; Walsh T; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Mäkelä M; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 23543512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems.
Nahvi A; Razavian A; Abedi H; Charati JY
Eur J Dent; 2018; 12(2):242-246. PubMed ID: 29988227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retention in fissure resin-based sealants in schoolchildren: the etching step importance.
Pereira TS; Clementino LC; Freire-Maia J; Martins-Júnior PA
Evid Based Dent; 2023 Jun; 24(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 37193878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.
Karaman E; Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23092148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Worthington H; Mäkelä M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 15266455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive.
Ntaoutidou S; Arhakis A; Tolidis K; Kotsanos N
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(6):431-437. PubMed ID: 30328064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive.
Aman N; Khan FR; Salim A; Farid H
J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 25657521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop.
Feigal RJ; Quelhas I
Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 14579879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
