These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35530916)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
    Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
    Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlation of pressure and displacement during gingival displacement: An in vitro study.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Schumayer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26548889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dentists' knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods.
    Alraheam IA; Hattar S; Al-Asmar A; Alhadidi A; Hamour SA; Aldroubi A; Sawair FA
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):574. PubMed ID: 37587482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.
    Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
    Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study.
    Diwan V; Chauhan MR; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Wani H; Danane S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Apr; 24(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 38650338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of alpha-adrenomimetic agents for gingival retraction: A randomized crossover clinical trial.
    Mehra N; Rathi A; Sharma R; Kaushik M; Sood T
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):533-537. PubMed ID: 33088060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of retraction materials on gingival health: A histopathological study.
    Phatale S; Marawar PP; Byakod G; Lagdive SB; Kalburge JV
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 14(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 20922077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
    Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review].
    Hong LG; Guo LP; Xue LL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Aug; 22(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 24100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gingival displacement before impression making: A prospective, comparative randomized clinical trial.
    Desclos-Theveniau M; Abgrall H; Bar V; Basle F; Basle D; Dautel MJ; Rubin J; Delanoue F; Lefrançois E; Dautel A; Sérandour AL; Le Guicher G; Colombel H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37919130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Comparative Analysis of Post-Retraction Changes in Gingival Height after Conventional and Surgical Gingival Displacement: Rotary Curettage, Diode and Er:YAG Laser Troughing.
    Kazakova R; Vlahova A; Tomov G; Dimitrova M; Kazakov S; Zlatev S; Forte M; Barile G; Corsalini M; Capodiferro S
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(16):. PubMed ID: 37628460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Effect of self-made colloid paste on gingival retraction in dogs].
    Li N; Liu WC; Zhang Y; Han DW; Wang YJ; Hu WQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Apr; 19(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 20485985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model.
    Dederichs M; Fahmy MD; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):784-789. PubMed ID: 31206914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of two gingival retraction systems on lateral gingival displacement: A prospective clinical study.
    Anupam P; Namratha N; Vibha S; Anandakrishna GN; Shally K; Singh A
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2013; 3(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 25737887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang Y; Fan F; Li X; Zhou Q; He B; Huang X; Huang S; Ma J
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(3):234-244. PubMed ID: 30773575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.
    Chaudhari J; Prajapati P; Patel J; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 26097353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
    Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
    Dent Update; 2014 Jun; 41(5):432-4, 437-8. PubMed ID: 25073225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.