These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35531232)

  • 1. Combination of fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques in land suitability assessment for wheat (
    Kılıc OM; Ersayın K; Gunal H; Khalofah A; Alsubeie MS
    Saudi J Biol Sci; 2022 Apr; 29(4):2634-2644. PubMed ID: 35531232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Land suitability assessment for wheat-barley cultivation in a semi-arid region of Eastern Anatolia in Turkey.
    Sarğın B; Karaca S
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16396. PubMed ID: 37927788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined Fuzzy AHP-GIS for Agricultural Land Suitability Modeling for a Watershed in Southern Iran.
    Tashayo B; Honarbakhsh A; Azma A; Akbari M
    Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 66(3):364-376. PubMed ID: 32533327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geographic information system-assisted site quality assessment for hazelnut cultivation using multi-criteria decision analysis in the Black Sea region, Turkey.
    Tercan E; Dengiz O; Özkan B; Dereli MA; Öztekin YB
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(24):35908-35933. PubMed ID: 35060033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying fuzzy inference system and analytic network process based on GIS to determine land suitability potential for agricultural.
    Seyedmohammadi J; Navidi MN
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Oct; 194(10):712. PubMed ID: 36040528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A GIS-based land evaluation model for peach cultivation by using AHP: a case study in NW Turkey.
    Everest T; Gür E
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Mar; 194(4):241. PubMed ID: 35243554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Land Suitability Assessment for Pistachio Cultivation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A Case Study of Mardin, Turkey.
    Mercan Ç; Acibuca V
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Oct; 195(11):1300. PubMed ID: 37828237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of geospatial technology on land suitability analysis for wheat and maize farming: In a case of Guder sub-watershed North West Oromia, Ethiopia.
    Gizawu Garbaba F; Negasa Wolteji B
    Heliyon; 2024 Jul; 10(13):e33557. PubMed ID: 39040410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis.
    Zarin R; Azmat M; Naqvi SR; Saddique Q; Ullah S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):19726-19741. PubMed ID: 33410005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-criteria GIS-based land suitability analysis for rice cultivation: a case study in Guilan Province, Iran.
    Bazkiaee PA; Kamkar B; Amiri E; Kazemi H; Rezaei M; Araji HA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Jul; 196(7):680. PubMed ID: 38954067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrated assessment of groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites using GIS and Fuzzy-AHP: a case study in Peddavagu watershed, India.
    Shekar PR; Mathew A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jun; 195(7):906. PubMed ID: 37382701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling of land suitability for surface irrigation using analytical hierarchy process method in Belessa Districts, northwestern Ethiopia.
    Wubalem A
    Heliyon; 2023 Mar; 9(3):e13937. PubMed ID: 36923863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing Coffee Agroforestry Systems Suitability Using Geospatial Analysis and Sentinel Satellite Data in Gedeo Zone, Ethiopia.
    Nigussie W; Al-Najjar H; Zhang W; Yirsaw E; Nega W; Zhang Z; Kalantar B
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Sep; 24(19):. PubMed ID: 39409329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
    Rashidi F; Sharifian S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fuzzy-based models' performance on qualitative and quantitative land suitability evaluation for cotton cultivation in Sarayan County, South Khorasan Province, Iran.
    Vahidi MJ; Behdani MA; Servati M; Naderi M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Mar; 195(4):488. PubMed ID: 36939935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geospatial insights into Alphonso mango cultivation: a comprehensive land suitability study in the coastal belt of Maharashtra, India.
    Wahane M; Saha D; Pal SK; Bera A; Das TK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Jul; 196(8):708. PubMed ID: 38970719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suitable site selection by using full consistency method (FUCOM): a case study for maize cultivation in northwest Turkey.
    Everest T; Savaşkan GS; Or A; Özcan H
    Environ Dev Sustain; 2022 Dec; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 36506642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey.
    Sener S; Sener E; Karagüzel R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Feb; 173(1-4):533-54. PubMed ID: 20213053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Land suitability modeling for newly reclaimed area using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis.
    Mohamed AH; Shendi MM; Awadalla AA; Mahmoud AG; Semida WM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Aug; 191(9):535. PubMed ID: 31375991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India.
    Ali SA; Parvin F; Al-Ansari N; Pham QB; Ahmad A; Raj MS; Anh DT; Ba LH; Thai VN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(6):7528-7550. PubMed ID: 33034852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.