BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3553195)

  • 1. Porous-surfaced metallic implants for orthopedic applications.
    Pilliar RM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Apr; 21(A1 Suppl):1-33. PubMed ID: 3553195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Powder metal-made orthopedic implants with porous surface for fixation by tissue ingrowth.
    Pilliar RM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):42-51. PubMed ID: 6851341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary observations of bone ingrowth into porous materials.
    Robertson DM; Pierre L; Chahal R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 May; 10(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 1270453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A high-modulus polymer for porous orthopedic implants: biomechanical compatibility of porous implants.
    Spector M; Michno MJ; Smarook WH; Kwiatkowski GT
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Sep; 12(5):665-77. PubMed ID: 701302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calcium phosphate sol-gel-derived thin films on porous-surfaced implants for enhanced osteoconductivity. Part II: Short-term in vivo studies.
    Gan L; Wang J; Tache A; Valiquette N; Deporter D; Pilliar R
    Biomaterials; 2004 Oct; 25(22):5313-21. PubMed ID: 15110482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone apposition to plasma-sprayed cobalt-chromium alloy.
    Luckey HA; Lamprecht EG; Walt MJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 May; 26(5):557-75. PubMed ID: 1512279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants.
    Ducheyne P; Hench LL; Kagan A; Martens M; Bursens A; Mulier JC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 7364787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (150):263-70. PubMed ID: 7428231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications.
    Ryan G; Pandit A; Apatsidis DP
    Biomaterials; 2006 May; 27(13):2651-70. PubMed ID: 16423390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osseointegration on metallic implant surfaces: effects of microgeometry and growth factor treatment.
    Frenkel SR; Simon J; Alexander H; Dennis M; Ricci JL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(6):706-13. PubMed ID: 12418014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science.
    Cohen R
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Apr; 31(4):216-7. PubMed ID: 12008853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Porous polymers for biological fixation.
    Spector M; Heyligers I; Roberson JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):207-19. PubMed ID: 2970907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC; Kent GM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 Jun; (149):291-8. PubMed ID: 7408314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains.
    Simmons CA; Meguid SA; Pilliar RM
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Mar; 19(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 11347689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference standards for implantable materials: problems and needs.
    Bruck SD; Mueller EP
    Med Prog Technol; 1989; 15(1-2):5-20. PubMed ID: 2530426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local delivery of bisphosphonate from coated orthopedic implants increases implants mechanical stability in osteoporotic rats.
    Peter B; Gauthier O; Laïb S; Bujoli B; Guicheux J; Janvier P; van Lenthe GH; Müller R; Zambelli PY; Bouler JM; Pioletti DP
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jan; 76(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 16254957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants.
    Clemow AJ; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Koeneman J; Anderson J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 7348706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.
    Pilliar RM; Lee JM; Maniatopoulos C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Jul; (208):108-13. PubMed ID: 3720113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterotopic bone formation around sintered porous-surfaced Ti-6Al-4V implants coated with native bone morphogenetic proteins.
    Simon Z; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Clokie CM
    Implant Dent; 2006 Sep; 15(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 16966900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.