143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35534405)
1. Impact of thyroid gland shielding on radiation doses in dental cone beam computed tomography with small and medium fields of view.
Grüning M; Koivisto J; Mah J; Bumann A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Aug; 134(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 35534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of thyroid gland shielding in dental CBCT using a paediatric anthropomorphic phantom.
Hidalgo A; Davies J; Horner K; Theodorakou C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140285. PubMed ID: 25411710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose reduction in head and neck organs through shielding and application of different scanning parameters in cone beam computed tomography: an effective dose study using an adult male anthropomorphic phantom.
Attaia D; Ting S; Johnson B; Masoud MI; Friedland B; Abu El Fotouh M; Abu El Sadat S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Jul; 130(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 31982369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions.
Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e376-80. PubMed ID: 22209523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of field of view (FOV) positioning and shielding on radiation dose in paediatric CBCT.
Vogiatzi T; Menz R; Verna C; Bornstein MM; Dagassan-Berndt D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20210316. PubMed ID: 35762346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the radiation protection effectiveness of a lead-free homopolymer in cone beam computed tomography.
Sarıbal GŞ; Canger EM; Yaray K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 136(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 37002015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of leaded glasses and thyroid shielding on cone beam CT radiation dose in an adult female phantom.
Goren AD; Prins RD; Dauer LT; Quinn B; Al-Najjar A; Faber RD; Patchell G; Branets I; Colosi DC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20120260. PubMed ID: 23412460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thyroid shielding in cone beam computed tomography: recommendations towards appropriate use.
Pauwels R; Horner K; Vassileva J; Rehani MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Oct; 48(7):20190014. PubMed ID: 31237774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.
Cheng HC; Wu VW; Liu ES; Kwong DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 20932676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology.
Kwok YM; Irani FG; Tay KH; Yang CC; Padre CG; Tan BS
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3197-204. PubMed ID: 23793520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws.
Davies J; Johnson B; Drage N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 22184626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
