141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35534405)
21. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Theodorakou C; Walker A; Horner K; Pauwels R; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R;
Br J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 85(1010):153-60. PubMed ID: 22308220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monte Carlo simulations of organ and effective doses and dose-length product for dental cone-beam CT.
Terashima S; Sano J; Osanai M; Toshima K; Ohuchi K; Hosokawa Y
Oral Radiol; 2024 Jan; 40(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 37597068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.
Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices.
Rottke D; Patzelt S; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120417. PubMed ID: 23584925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. EVALUATION OF THYROID RADIATION DOSE USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Setti da Rocha ASP; de Mello Aguiar G; Tulio AP; Ditzel AS; Filipov D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jul; 175(3):368-372. PubMed ID: 28013189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of absorbed doses and organ doses measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters and Gafchromic film for cone beam computed tomography examination of the posterior mandibular region in a head phantom.
Cederhag J; Kadesjö N; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellén-Halme K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):769-776. PubMed ID: 37625926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dose reduction of cone beam CT scanning for the entire oral and maxillofacial regions with thyroid collars.
Qu XM; Li G; Sanderink GC; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 22707330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.
Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Hernández-Girón I; Casanovas R; Ortega R; Calzado A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):92555893. PubMed ID: 22933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiation exposure in cone beam CT measured using a MOSFET and RPLGD dosimeter and Monte Carlo simulation in phantom.
Kweon DC
J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(4):837-852. PubMed ID: 37248944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A manufacturer's role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: effect of beam filtration.
Ludlow JB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21239575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ.
Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.
Lukat TD; Wong JC; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130082. PubMed ID: 24048693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric evaluation for temporomandibular joint cone beam computed tomography exams using different field of view.
Pinto CA; Caetano GFDR; Andrade MEA; Panzarella FK; Junqueira JLC; Peroni LV; Nascimento MDCC
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Sep; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34488205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
