143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35534405)
41. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from cone-beam computed tomography.
Rottke D; Andersson J; Ejima KI; Sawada K; Schulze D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 27664428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dosimetric study of mandible examinations performed with three cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
Khoury HJ; Andrade ME; Araujo MW; Brasileiro IV; Kramer R; Huda A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):162-5. PubMed ID: 25897144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dose distributions in adult and child head phantoms for panoramic and cone beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint.
Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Hellén-Halme K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 32094027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose?
Gunn ML; Kanal KM; Kolokythas O; Anzai Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 19940673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
Chau AC; Fung K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner.
Koivisto J; Wolff J; Järnstedt J; Dastidar P; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25151590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pediatric Phantom Dosimetry of Kodak 9000 Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Yepes JF; Booe MR; Sanders BJ; Jones JE; Ehrlich Y; Ludlow JB; Johnson B
Pediatr Dent; 2017 May; 39(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 28583248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners].
Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Radiation dosimetry analyses of radiographic imaging systems used for orthodontic treatment: comparison among child, adolescent, and adult patients.
Lee KS; Nam OH; Kim GT; Choi SC; Choi YS; Hwang EH
Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):245-250. PubMed ID: 32361820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Rotating and translating anthropomorphic head voxel models to establish an horizontal Frankfort plane for dental CBCT Monte Carlo simulations: a dose comparison study.
Stratis A; Zhang G; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(24):N681-N696. PubMed ID: 27893451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessment of the effective doses from two dental cone beam CT devices.
Schilling R; Geibel MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120273. PubMed ID: 23420855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
