80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35534733)
1. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.
Xu S; Zhang XP; Zhao GD; Zou WB; Zhao ZM; Hu MG; Gao YX; Tan XL; Liu Q; Liu R
Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8237-8248. PubMed ID: 35534733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wehrle CJ; Chang JH; Gross AR; Woo K; Naples R; Stackhouse KA; Dahdaleh F; Augustin T; Joyce D; Simon R; Walsh RM; Naffouje SA
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2602-2610. PubMed ID: 38498210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Liu Q; Li M; Gao Y; Jiang T; Han B; Zhao G; Lin C; Lau WY; Zhao Z; Liu R
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 May; 9(5):428-437. PubMed ID: 38428441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison.
Vandeputte M; Vansteenkiste F; Ceelen W; De Meyere C; D'Hondt M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jan; 408(1):16. PubMed ID: 36624235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study.
Emmen AMLH; Zwart MJW; Khatkov IE; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Busch OR; Saint-Marc O; Dokmak S; Molenaar IQ; D'Hondt M; Ramera M; Keck T; Ferrari G; Luyer MDP; Moraldi L; Ielpo B; Wittel U; Souche FR; Hackert T; Lips D; Can MF; Bosscha K; Fara R; Festen S; van Dieren S; Coratti A; De Hingh I; Mazzola M; Wellner U; De Meyere C; van Santvoort HC; Aussilhou B; Ibenkhayat A; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Surgery; 2024 Jun; 175(6):1587-1594. PubMed ID: 38570225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining the learning curve for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for a single surgeon following experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
DeLaura I; Sharib J; Creasy JM; Berchuck SI; Blazer DG; Lidsky ME; Shah KN; Zani S
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):126. PubMed ID: 38492057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is there value to a laparoscopic approach?
Stauffer JA; Hyman D; Porrazzo G; Tice M; Li Z; Almerey T
Surgery; 2024 Apr; 175(4):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 38307785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted radical resection versus open surgery for cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu J; Wang L; Yu F; Wang L; Leng Z
J Robot Surg; 2024 May; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 38713337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hepatic artery resection in distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Sumiyoshi T; Uemura K; Takasaki T; Kondo N; Katayama K; Okada K; Seo S; Otsuka H; Serikawa M; Ishii Y; Tomofumi T; Takahashi S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jan; 408(1):58. PubMed ID: 36688973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What are the true benefits of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic cancer?
Stefanova I; Vescio F; Nickel F; Merali N; Ammendola M; Lahiri RP; Pencavel TD; Worthington TR; Frampton AE
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38712525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic versus open central pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single centre.
Yang D; Li M; Li Z; Zhang L; Hu W; Ke N; Xiong J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jan; 408(1):40. PubMed ID: 36652008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians.
Ross S; Sucandy I; Vasanthakumar P; Christodoulou M; Pattilachan T; Rosemurgy A
J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 38668931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Versus Open Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Placement for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Ten Haaft BHEA; Franssen S; van Dorst RWJJ; Rousian M; Pilz da Cunha G; de Wilde RF; Erdmann JI; Groot Koerkamp B; Hagendoorn J; Swijnenburg RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):4022-4029. PubMed ID: 38498089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Survival and Recurrence After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Microscopic Residual Tumor (R1) Associated with Higher Rates of Local Recurrence?
Umino R; Nara S; Mizui T; Takamoto T; Ban D; Esaki M; Hiraoka N; Shimada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38679686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy following phase 2a IDEAL guidelines.
Mise Y; Miyashita M; Yoshioka R; Kawano F; Takeda Y; Ichida H; Saiura A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302848. PubMed ID: 38709730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of perioperative oral care management in the prevention of surgical complications in 503 patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable malignant tumor: A multicenter retrospective analysis using propensity score matching.
Yamguchi T; Mori K; Kojima Y; Hasegawa T; Hirota J; Akashi M; Soutome S; Yoshimatsu M; Nobuhara H; Matsugu Y; Kato S; Shibuya Y; Kurita H; Yamada SI; Nakahara H;
Surgery; 2024 Apr; 175(4):1128-1133. PubMed ID: 38061914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy and Conventional Distal Pancreatosplenectomy for Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer: Korean Multicenter Propensity Score Match Analysis.
Kwon J; Lee H; Kim H; Kim SH; Yang JD; Lee W; Lee JS; Shin SH; Kim HJ
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 38672628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients.
Sijberden JP; Hoogteijling TJ; Aghayan D; Ratti F; Tan EK; Morrison-Jones V; Lanari J; Haentjens L; Wei K; Tzedakis S; Martinie J; Osei Bordom D; Zimmitti G; Crespo K; Magistri P; Russolillo N; Conci S; Görgec B; Benedetti Cacciaguerra A; D'Souza D; Zozaya G; Caula C; Geller D; Robles Campos R; Croner R; Rehman S; Jovine E; Efanov M; Alseidi A; Memeo R; Dagher I; Giuliante F; Sparrelid E; Ahmad J; Gallagher T; Schmelzle M; Swijnenburg RJ; Fretland ÅA; Cipriani F; Koh YX; White S; Lopez Ben S; Rotellar F; Serrano PE; Vivarelli M; Ruzzenente A; Ferrero A; Di Benedetto F; Besselink MG; Sucandy I; Sutcliffe RP; Vrochides D; Fuks D; Liu R; D'Hondt M; Cillo U; Primrose JN; Goh BKP; Aldrighetti LA; Edwin B; Abu Hilal M;
Ann Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38482665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex disparity in clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis after liver resection for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.
Zou Y; Xu X; Wu T; Chen Q; Li Z; Yang Z; Wang K; Shen F
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(9):e29910. PubMed ID: 38707344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
