These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3553549)

  • 1. A comparison of the compatibility of elastomeric impression materials, type IV dental stones, and liquid media.
    Gerrow JD; Schneider RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3553549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compatibility of type IV dental stones with polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Schelb E; Mazzocco CV; Jones JD; Prihoda T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jul; 58(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 3475458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automixing: a new concept in elastomeric impression material delivery systems.
    Keck SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):479-83. PubMed ID: 3900344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of a combined reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression system with other commonly used impression materials.
    Herring HW; Tames MA; Zardiackas LD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Dec; 52(6):795-9. PubMed ID: 6392511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface detail reproduction of Type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Schelb E; Cavazos E; Troendle KB; Prihoda TJ
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1784720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG; Vahidi F; Bae KH; Lim BS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Aug; 97(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2678420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EVALUATION OF MATERIALS USED FOR INDIRECT TECHNICS.
    PEYTON FA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():213-23. PubMed ID: 14276026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials.
    Linke BA; Nicholls JI; Faucher RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):794-802. PubMed ID: 3908660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of an optimal magnification for examining voids in elastomeric impressions.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):573-6. PubMed ID: 2083026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of hydrogen gas released from polyvinylsiloxane impression materials in contact with die stone materials.
    McCrosson J; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Anderson RA
    J Dent; 1987 Jun; 15(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 3475300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mixing ratio on properties of elastomeric dental impression materials.
    Finger W; Ohsawa M
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 3462066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working time of elastomeric impression materials.
    Ohsawa M; Finger W
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 3462065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.