These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3553549)
41. Comparing the accuracy of reversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. Federick DR; Caputo A J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Feb; 128(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 9037971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Tensile and peel bond strengths of tray adhesives. Grant BE; Tjan AH J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Feb; 59(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 3278100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems. Gerrow JD; Price RB J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Viscoelastic properties of setting elastomeric impression materials. de Araujo PA; Jorgensen KD; Finger W J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Nov; 54(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 3903132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials. Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Mastering the impression technique for simple to complex treatments. Paquette JM; Sheets CG Dent Today; 2000 Jun; 19(6):68-75. PubMed ID: 12524795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Linear distortion and compatibility of an antimicrobial irreversible hydrocolloid impression material and improved dental stones. Sevedge SR; Gunderson RB; Singer MT J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 2691667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Impression technique for ovate pontics. de Vasconcellos DK; Volpato CÂ; Zani IM; Bottino MA J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Accuracy of impression materials measured with a vertical height gauge. Lewinstein I; Craig RG J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jul; 17(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 2213324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Compatibility of impressions and die stone material. Omana HM; Rinne VW; Truong TT Oper Dent; 1990; 15(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 2133931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Compatibility of agar hydrocolloid duplicating materials with dental stones. Barrett NV; Brukl CE J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 3862819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction. Tan E; Chai J Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Donovan TE; Chee WW Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. PubMed ID: 15172610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period. Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System. de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials. Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials. Idris B; Houston F; Claffey N J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 8809262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]