30 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35536391)
1. Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening.
Gennaro G; Povolo L; Del Genio S; Ciampani L; Fasoli C; Carlevaris P; Petrioli M; Masiero T; Maggetto F; Caumo F
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38019313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Waade GG; Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160770. PubMed ID: 28102696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-Assisted Compression in Screening Mammography: Patient Experience and Image Quality.
Dontchos BN; Edmonds CE; Mercaldo SF; Miles RC; Chu KF; Lehman CD
J Breast Imaging; 2019 Sep; 1(3):192-198. PubMed ID: 38424767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality.
Broeders MJ; Ten Voorde M; Veldkamp WJ; van Engen RE; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; 't Jong-Gunneman MN; de Win J; Greve KD; Paap E; den Heeten GJ
Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):821-9. PubMed ID: 25504427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Glandular doses and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for Saudi breast cancer screening programme (2012-2021).
Albeshan SM; Alhulail AA; Almuqbil MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 38324508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Association of Mammography Environment and Image Quality.
Sarquis-Kolber S; Schilling K; Hanney WJ; Kolber MJ
J Breast Imaging; 2020 Sep; 2(5):436-442. PubMed ID: 38424903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic compression practices of force- and pressure-standardisation protocol: A scoping review.
Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 32420700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of breast implants mammography examinations for identification of suitable image quality criteria.
Sá Dos Reis C; Gremion I; Richli Meystre N
Insights Imaging; 2020 Jan; 11(1):3. PubMed ID: 31900684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current practice in mammographic imaging of the augmented breast in Australia.
O'Keefe JR; Wilkinson JM; Spuur KM
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Jun; 67(2):102-110. PubMed ID: 31981297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Imaging Physics in Mammography (Part I).
Fico N; Di Grezia G; Cuccurullo V; Salvia AAH; Iacomino A; Sciarra A; Gatta G
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37892053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea.
Pape R; Spuur KM; Wilkinson JM; Zuhukepe A
J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Mar; 69(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 34418330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the patient-assisted compression mode affect the mammography quality? A within-woman randomized controlled trial.
Perez-Leon D; Posso M; Louro J; Ejarque B; Arranz M; Arenas N; Maiques J; Martínez J; Maciá F; Román M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Castells X; Alcántara R
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7470-7479. PubMed ID: 35536391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.
Arenas N; Alcantara R; Posso M; Louro J; Perez-Leon D; Ejarque B; Arranz M; Maiques J; Castells X; Macià F; Román M; Rodríguez-Arana A
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7480-7487. PubMed ID: 35536390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
