These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35537273)

  • 1. Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal.
    Eckstein MK; Master SL; Dahl RE; Wilbrecht L; Collins AGE
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 55():101106. PubMed ID: 35537273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intact Reinforcement Learning But Impaired Attentional Control During Multidimensional Probabilistic Learning in Older Adults.
    Daniel R; Radulescu A; Niv Y
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 31826943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational evidence for hierarchically structured reinforcement learning in humans.
    Eckstein MK; Collins AGE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(47):29381-29389. PubMed ID: 33229518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinforcement Learning during Adolescence in Rats.
    Moin Afshar N; Keip AJ; Taylor JR; Lee D; Groman SM
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(30):5857-5870. PubMed ID: 32601244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling changes in probabilistic reinforcement learning during adolescence.
    Xia L; Master SL; Eckstein MK; Baribault B; Dahl RE; Wilbrecht L; Collins AGE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1008524. PubMed ID: 34197447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confirmatory reinforcement learning changes with age during adolescence.
    Chierchia G; Soukupová M; Kilford EJ; Griffin C; Leung J; Palminteri S; Blakemore SJ
    Dev Sci; 2023 May; 26(3):e13330. PubMed ID: 36194156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C receptor antagonism differentially modulate reinforcement learning and cognitive flexibility: behavioural and computational evidence.
    Hervig ME; Zühlsdorff K; Olesen SF; Phillips B; Božič T; Dalley JW; Cardinal RN; Alsiö J; Robbins TW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2024 Aug; 241(8):1631-1644. PubMed ID: 38594515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amygdala and Ventral Striatum Make Distinct Contributions to Reinforcement Learning.
    Costa VD; Dal Monte O; Lucas DR; Murray EA; Averbeck BB
    Neuron; 2016 Oct; 92(2):505-517. PubMed ID: 27720488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Computational Account of Optimizing Social Predictions Reveals That Adolescents Are Conservative Learners in Social Contexts.
    Rosenblau G; Korn CW; Pelphrey KA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 38(4):974-988. PubMed ID: 29255008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medial prefrontal cortex and the adaptive regulation of reinforcement learning parameters.
    Khamassi M; Enel P; Dominey PF; Procyk E
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():441-64. PubMed ID: 23317844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning and forgetting using reinforced Bayesian change detection.
    Moens V; Zénon A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Apr; 15(4):e1006713. PubMed ID: 30995214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spontaneous eye blink rate predicts individual differences in exploration and exploitation during reinforcement learning.
    Van Slooten JC; Jahfari S; Theeuwes J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17436. PubMed ID: 31758031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcement and reversal learning in first-episode psychosis.
    Murray GK; Cheng F; Clark L; Barnett JH; Blackwell AD; Fletcher PC; Robbins TW; Bullmore ET; Jones PB
    Schizophr Bull; 2008 Sep; 34(5):848-55. PubMed ID: 18628272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability in Action Selection Relates to Striatal Dopamine 2/3 Receptor Availability in Humans: A PET Neuroimaging Study Using Reinforcement Learning and Active Inference Models.
    Adams RA; Moutoussis M; Nour MM; Dahoun T; Lewis D; Illingworth B; Veronese M; Mathys C; de Boer L; Guitart-Masip M; Friston KJ; Howes OD; Roiser JP
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 May; 30(6):3573-3589. PubMed ID: 32083297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cognitive-computational account of mood swings in adolescence.
    Gregorová K; Eldar E; Deserno L; Reiter AMF
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2024 Apr; 28(4):290-303. PubMed ID: 38503636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regional Striatal Cholinergic Involvement in Human Behavioral Flexibility.
    Bell T; Lindner M; Langdon A; Mullins PG; Christakou A
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5740-5749. PubMed ID: 31109959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Demonstration via Bayesian Network-Based Knowledge Extraction.
    Zhang Y; Lan Y; Fang Q; Xu X; Li J; Zeng Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():7588221. PubMed ID: 34603434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autonomic responses to choice outcomes: Links to task performance and reinforcement-learning parameters.
    Hayes WM; Wedell DH
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Oct; 156():107968. PubMed ID: 33027684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diminished reinforcement sensitivity in adolescence is associated with enhanced response switching and reduced coding of choice probability in the medial frontal pole.
    Waltmann M; Herzog N; Reiter AMF; Villringer A; Horstmann A; Deserno L
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Apr; 60():101226. PubMed ID: 36905874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning.
    Chase HW; Swainson R; Durham L; Benham L; Cools R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):936-46. PubMed ID: 20146610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.