BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35537506)

  • 1. Effect of substrate stiffness on the mechanical properties of cervical cancer cells.
    Zhuang Y; Huang Y; He Z; Liu T; Yu X; Xin SX
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2022 Aug; 725():109281. PubMed ID: 35537506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alteration of Young's modulus in mesenchymal stromal cells during osteogenesis measured by atomic force microscopy.
    Yen MH; Chen YH; Liu YS; Lee OK
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2020 Jun; 526(3):827-832. PubMed ID: 32273088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Substrate stiffness regulates apoptosis and the mRNA expression of extracellular matrix regulatory genes in the rat annular cells.
    Zhang YH; Zhao CQ; Jiang LS; Dai LY
    Matrix Biol; 2011 Mar; 30(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 21055467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of viscoelastic properties of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness substrates.
    Rianna C; Radmacher M
    Eur Biophys J; 2017 May; 46(4):309-324. PubMed ID: 27645213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulation of Endothelial Cell Adherence and Elastic Modulus by Substrate Stiffness.
    Jalali S; Tafazzoli-Shadpour M; Haghighipour N; Omidvar R; Safshekan F
    Cell Commun Adhes; 2015; 22(2-6):79-89. PubMed ID: 27960555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Membrane cholesterol and substrate stiffness co-ordinate to induce the remodelling of the cytoskeleton and the alteration in the biomechanics of vascular smooth muscle cells.
    Sanyour HJ; Li N; Rickel AP; Childs JD; Kinser CN; Hong Z
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Jul; 115(8):1369-1380. PubMed ID: 30395154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beta 1 integrin binding plays a role in the constant traction force generation in response to varying stiffness for cells grown on mature cardiac extracellular matrix.
    Gershlak JR; Black LD
    Exp Cell Res; 2015 Jan; 330(2):311-324. PubMed ID: 25220424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reprogramming cellular phenotype by soft collagen gels.
    Ali MY; Chuang CY; Saif MT
    Soft Matter; 2014 Nov; 10(44):8829-37. PubMed ID: 25284029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells.
    Bhana B; Iyer RK; Chen WL; Zhao R; Sider KL; Likhitpanichkul M; Simmons CA; Radisic M
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Apr; 105(6):1148-60. PubMed ID: 20014437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of local and global elastic moduli of valve interstitial cells cultured on soft substrates.
    Liu H; Sun Y; Simmons CA
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1967-71. PubMed ID: 23746597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear Cellular Mechanical Behavior Adaptation to Substrate Mechanics Identified by Atomic Force Microscope.
    Mollaeian K; Liu Y; Bi S; Wang Y; Ren J; Lu M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Nov; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 30400365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mechanical properties of Jurkat cell on adhesion properties of Jurkat integrin and VCAM-1: An AFM study.
    Zhao L; Fu X; Zhang L; Ye Z
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2022 Oct; 218():112784. PubMed ID: 36030725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft matrices inhibit cell proliferation and inactivate the fibrotic phenotype of deep endometriotic stromal cells in vitro.
    Matsuzaki S; Canis M; Pouly JL; Darcha C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 26762314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of adhesion properties of the cardiomyocyte integrins and extracellular matrix proteins using atomic force microscopy.
    Li Z; Liu T; Yang J; Lin J; Xin SX
    J Mol Recognit; 2020 Apr; 33(4):e2823. PubMed ID: 31709699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical Properties of Soft Biological Membranes for Organ-on-a-Chip Assessed by Bulge Test and AFM.
    Zamprogno P; Thoma G; Cencen V; Ferrari D; Putz B; Michler J; Fantner GE; Guenat OT
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2021 Jul; 7(7):2990-2997. PubMed ID: 33651947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pancreatic Cancer Presents Distinct Nanomechanical Properties During Progression.
    Stylianou A; Voutouri C; Mpekris F; Stylianopoulos T
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jul; 51(7):1602-1615. PubMed ID: 36813931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical characterization of cervical squamous carcinoma cells by atomic force microscopy at nanoscale.
    Ding YX; Cheng Y; Sun QM; Zhang YY; You K; Guo YL; Han D; Geng L
    Med Oncol; 2015 Mar; 32(3):71. PubMed ID: 25694045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone marrow CD34
    Zhang S; Ma X; Guo J; Yao K; Wang C; Dong Z; Zhu H; Fan F; Huang Z; Yang X; Qian J; Zou Y; Sun A; Ge J
    Stem Cell Res Ther; 2017 Dec; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 29237495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Substrate Stiffness Modulates the Growth, Phenotype, and Chemoresistance of Ovarian Cancer Cells.
    Fan Y; Sun Q; Li X; Feng J; Ao Z; Li X; Wang J
    Front Cell Dev Biol; 2021; 9():718834. PubMed ID: 34504843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased Substrate Stiffness Elicits a Myofibroblastic Phenotype in Human Lamina Cribrosa Cells.
    Liu B; Kilpatrick JI; Lukasz B; Jarvis SP; McDonnell F; Wallace DM; Clark AF; O'Brien CJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 59(2):803-814. PubMed ID: 29392327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.