218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35537612)
1. Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up.
Willems JH; Smulders K; Innocenti M; Bosker BH; van Hellemondt GG
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Nov; 37(11):2239-2246. PubMed ID: 35537612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of a standard-length conical tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty to address Paprosky type I-II femoral defects: a prospective study of 87 patients.
Innocenti M; Smulders K; Andreotti M; Willems JH; Van Hellemondt G; Nijhof MW
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Sep; 143(9):5945-5955. PubMed ID: 36806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.
Otero JE; Martin JR; Rowe TM; Odum SM; Mason JB
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1069-1073. PubMed ID: 31870582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modular diaphyseal anchor stems with locking screws in the hip revision with massive femoral defects.
Marqués López F; Sala Pujals A; Fraile Suari A; Tey Pons M; León García A
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed); 2020; 64(6):409-414. PubMed ID: 32800719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micromotion and subsidence of a cementless conical fluted stem depending on femoral defect size - A human cadaveric study.
Ellenrieder M; Souffrant R; Schulze C; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105202. PubMed ID: 33129564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Role for Modern Primary Cementless Femoral Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.
Skibicki HE; Post ZD; Kay AB; Czymek MM; Ong AC; Orozco FR; Ponzio DY
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 34053749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conical Primary Cementless Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: 94 Consecutive Implantations at a Mean Follow-Up of 12.7 years.
Romagnoli S; Marullo M; Corbella M; Zero E; Parente A; Bargagliotti M
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Mar; 36(3):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 33187858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does metaphyseal modularity in femoral revision stems have a role in treating bone defects less severe than IIIB? Clinical and radiological results of a series of 163 modular femoral stems.
Soleilhavoup M; Villatte G; Cambier S; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Oct; 108(6):103353. PubMed ID: 35716986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Moriarty P; Sheridan GA; Wong L; Guerin S; Gul R; Harty JA
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Aug; 35(8):2195-2199. PubMed ID: 32327285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteointegration of an uncemented modular revision stem implanted during revision hip surgery.
Šponer P; Kučera T; Urban K; Zítko D; Diaz-Garcia D; Grinac M
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2014; 57(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 25649365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components.
Clair AJ; Gabor JA; Patel KS; Friedlander S; Deshmukh AJ; Schwarzkopf R
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S299-S303. PubMed ID: 32253066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cement augmentation in the proximal femur to prevent stem subsidence in revision hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type II/IIIa defects.
Tsai SW; Chen CF; Wu PK; Chen CM; Chen WM
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Jun; 81(6):571-576. PubMed ID: 29428321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Wang L; Dai Z; Wen T; Li M; Hu Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Feb; 133(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 23124491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mid-term results of previously cemented hip arthroplasties revised with uncemented modular femoral components: a retrospective study.
Duymus TM; Solak Z; Ozturkmen Y; Azboy I; Mutlu S; Caniklioglu M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Aug; 10():123. PubMed ID: 26269201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.
Wirtz DC; Gravius S; Ascherl R; Thorweihe M; Forst R; Noeth U; Maus UM; Wimmer MD; Zeiler G; Deml MC
Acta Orthop; 2014 Dec; 85(6):562-9. PubMed ID: 25175667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty].
Schofer MD; Efe T; Heyse TJ; Timmesfeld N; Velte R; Hinrichs F; Schmitt J
Orthopade; 2010 Feb; 39(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 19784618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem.
Gabor JA; Padilla JA; Feng JE; Schnaser E; Lutes WB; Park KJ; Incavo S; Vigdorchik J; Schwarzkopf R
Bone Joint J; 2020 Feb; 102-B(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 32009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
