These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3554055)

  • 1. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal monitoring and predictions by clinicians: observations during a randomized clinical trial in very low birth weight infants.
    Larson EB; van Belle G; Shy KK; Luthy DA; Strickland D; Hughes JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Oct; 74(4):584-9. PubMed ID: 2797635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring, as compared with periodic auscultation, on the neurologic development of premature infants.
    Shy KK; Luthy DA; Bennett FC; Whitfield M; Larson EB; van Belle G; Hughes JP; Wilson JA; Stenchever MA
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Mar; 322(9):588-93. PubMed ID: 2406602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VII. The impact of mode of delivery on fetal outcome.
    Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Smith PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 143(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 7081332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical analysis of continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring for preterm small for gestational age during labor].
    Guo XH; Su FM; Zhang HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 40(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 15840290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone].
    Pan J; Ye M; Du X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.
    Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update.
    Thacker SB; Stroup DF; Peterson HB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):613-20. PubMed ID: 7675390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and determination of fetal scalp blood pH in prediction of intrapartum fetal distress.
    Dai MS; Fox H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1991 Feb; 104(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 1874012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?
    Weiss PM; Balducci J; Reed J; Klasko SK; Rust OA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 9438212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perinatal outcomes of polyhydramnios without associated congenital fetal anomalies after the gestational age of 20 weeks.
    Chen KC; Liou JD; Hung TH; Kuo DM; Hsu JJ; Hsieh CC; Hsieh TT
    Chang Gung Med J; 2005 Apr; 28(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 16013341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Labor monitoring in high-risk situations].
    Houfflin-Debarge V; Closset E; Deruelle P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S81-92. PubMed ID: 18191501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association?
    Parer JT; King T; Flanders S; Fox M; Kilpatrick SJ
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16753769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prevention of perinatal asphyxia. Can more be done by fetal monitoring?].
    Herbst A
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3484-8. PubMed ID: 11037592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.