These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35543894)
1. Clinical and phantom validation of a deep learning based denoising algorithm for F-18-FDG PET images from lower detection counting in comparison with the standard acquisition. Bonardel G; Dupont A; Decazes P; Queneau M; Modzelewski R; Coulot J; Le Calvez N; Hapdey S EJNMMI Phys; 2022 May; 9(1):36. PubMed ID: 35543894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image Denoising of Low-Dose PET Mouse Scans with Deep Learning: Validation Study for Preclinical Imaging Applicability. Muller FM; Vervenne B; Maebe J; Blankemeyer E; Sellmyer MA; Zhou R; Karp JS; Vanhove C; Vandenberghe S Mol Imaging Biol; 2024 Feb; 26(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 37875748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose Loft M; Ladefoged CN; Johnbeck CB; Carlsen EA; Oturai P; Langer SW; Knigge U; Andersen FL; Kjaer A J Nucl Med; 2023 Jun; 64(6):951-959. PubMed ID: 37169532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual high-count PET image generation using a deep learning method. Liu J; Ren S; Wang R; Mirian N; Tsai YJ; Kulon M; Pucar D; Chen MK; Liu C Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):5830-5840. PubMed ID: 35880541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of FDG PET/CT image-based cancer staging and standardized uptake values with simulated reduction of injected FDG dose or acquisition time. Niederkohr RD; Hayden SP; Hamill JJ; Jones JP; Schaefferkoetter JD; Chiu E Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021; 11(5):428-442. PubMed ID: 34754613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and lesion detectability in low-dose pediatric Zhao YM; Li YH; Chen T; Zhang WG; Wang LH; Feng J; Li C; Zhang X; Fan W; Hu YY Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Oct; 48(11):3378-3385. PubMed ID: 33738519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiotracer dose reduction in integrated PET/MR: implications from national electrical manufacturers association phantom studies. Oehmigen M; Ziegler S; Jakoby BW; Georgi JC; Paulus DH; Quick HH J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1361-7. PubMed ID: 25006216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deep learning-assisted PET imaging achieves fast scan/low-dose examination. Xing Y; Qiao W; Wang T; Wang Y; Li C; Lv Y; Xi C; Liao S; Qian Z; Zhao J EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Feb; 9(1):7. PubMed ID: 35122172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time-of-flight PET/CT using low-activity protocols: potential implications for cancer therapy monitoring. Murray I; Kalemis A; Glennon J; Hasan S; Quraishi S; Beyer T; Avril N Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(9):1643-53. PubMed ID: 20428866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal clinical protocols for total-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examination under different activity administration plans. Huang Y; Wang M; Jiang L; Wang L; Chen L; Wang Q; Feng J; Wang J; Xu W; Wu H; Han Y EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Feb; 10(1):14. PubMed ID: 36808378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image Quality and Activity Optimization in Oncologic van Sluis J; Boellaard R; Dierckx RAJO; Stormezand GN; Glaudemans AWJM; Noordzij W J Nucl Med; 2020 May; 61(5):764-771. PubMed ID: 31628214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]