These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35548500)

  • 1. Analysis of Implicit Communication of Motorists and Cyclists in Intersection Using Video and Trajectory Data.
    Zhang M; Dotzauer M; Schießl C
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():864488. PubMed ID: 35548500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online risk estimation of critical and non-critical interactions between right-turning motorists and crossing cyclists by a decision tree.
    Saul H; Junghans M; Dotzauer M; Gimm K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106449. PubMed ID: 34749268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Support systems for cyclists in automated traffic: A review and future outlook.
    Berge SH; de Winter J; Hagenzieker M
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Sep; 111():104043. PubMed ID: 37156127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanisms underlying cognitive conspicuity in the detection of cyclists by car drivers.
    Rogé J; Ndiaye D; Aillerie I; Aillerie S; Navarro J; Vienne F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():88-95. PubMed ID: 28494259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactions Between Heavy Trucks and Vulnerable Road Users-A Systematic Review to Inform the Interactive Capabilities of Highly Automated Trucks.
    Fabricius V; Habibovic A; Rizgary D; Andersson J; Wärnestål P
    Front Robot AI; 2022; 9():818019. PubMed ID: 35316985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Truck drivers' behavior in encounters with vulnerable road users at intersections: Results from a test-track experiment.
    Schindler R; Bianchi Piccinini G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106289. PubMed ID: 34340136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cyclists' Anger As Determinant of Near Misses Involving Different Road Users.
    Marín Puchades V; Prati G; Rondinella G; De Angelis M; Fassina F; Fraboni F; Pietrantoni L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2203. PubMed ID: 29326631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behavior and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study.
    Duivenvoorden K; Hogema J; Hagenzieker M; Wegman F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():254-9. PubMed ID: 25000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do cyclists interact with motorized vehicles at unsignalized intersections? Modeling cyclists' yielding behavior using naturalistic data.
    Mohammadi A; Bianchi Piccinini G; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107156. PubMed ID: 37327632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections.
    Dill J; Monsere CM; McNeil N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Jan; 44(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 22062346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resilient interactions between cyclists and drivers, and what does this mean for automated vehicles?
    Parnell KJ; Merriman SE; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2024 May; 117():104237. PubMed ID: 38354551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are signalized intersections with cycle tracks safer? A case-control study based on automated surrogate safety analysis using video data.
    Zangenehpour S; Strauss J; Miranda-Moreno LF; Saunier N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jan; 86():161-72. PubMed ID: 26562673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit intention communication as a design opportunity for automated vehicles: Understanding drivers' interpretation of vehicle trajectory at narrow passages.
    Miller L; Leitner J; Kraus J; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106691. PubMed ID: 35667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction driver-bicyclist on rural roads: Effects of cross-sections and road geometric elements.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():191-201. PubMed ID: 28319757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinematic cues in driver-pedestrian communication to support safe road crossing.
    Zach Noonan T; Gershon P; Domeyer J; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107236. PubMed ID: 37531855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Truck drivers' interaction with cyclists in right-turn situations.
    Kircher K; Ahlström C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105515. PubMed ID: 32380238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sharing roads with automated vehicles: A questionnaire investigation from drivers', cyclists' and pedestrians' perspectives.
    Li X; Kaye SA; Afghari AP; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107093. PubMed ID: 37150131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the safety criticality of driver behavior toward cyclists at intersections.
    Gohl I; Schneider A; Nitsch V
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup3):45-50. PubMed ID: 31951744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for the 'safety in density' effect for cyclists: validation of agent-based modelling results.
    Thompson JH; Wijnands JS; Mavoa S; Scully K; Stevenson MR
    Inj Prev; 2019 Oct; 25(5):379-385. PubMed ID: 30315090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.