BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35548894)

  • 1. Arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to diagnose prostate cancer.
    Ziayee F; Mueller-Lutz A; Gross J; Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2022 Mar; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 35548894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy.
    Ziayee F; Müller-Lutz A; Gross J; Quentin M; Ullrich T; Heusch P; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 53():28-33. PubMed ID: 29902565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection.
    Ziayee F; Ullrich T; Blondin D; Irmer H; Arsov C; Antoch G; Quentin M; Schimmöller L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249532. PubMed ID: 33819295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method.
    Ginsburg SB; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Vainio P; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 27285161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
    Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and noncancerous tissue in the peripheral zone and central gland using the quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI: A meta-analysis.
    Gao P; Shi C; Zhao L; Zhou Q; Luo L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Dec; 95(52):e5715. PubMed ID: 28033274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging: the role of qualitative and quantitative parameters for evaluating prostate tumors stratified by Gleason score and PI-RADS v2.
    Afshari Mirak S; Mohammadian Bajgiran A; Sung K; Asvadi NH; Markovic D; Felker ER; Lu D; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Raman SS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jul; 45(7):2225-2234. PubMed ID: 31549211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of quantitative zonal parameters of prostate gland in discrimination of normal, benign, and malignant conditions: are these the more reliable parameters in the diagnosis of prostate cancer?
    Karaca L; Özdemir ZM; Kahraman A; Çelik H; Kaya S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Nov; 27(22):11122-11130. PubMed ID: 38039044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of arterial input function selection on the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Azahaf M; Haberlay M; Betrouni N; Ernst O; Behal H; Duhamel A; Ouzzane A; Puech P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 26303794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI with a Split Dose of Gadoterate Meglumine for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Fan X; Chatterjee A; Pittman JM; Yousuf A; Antic T; Karczmar GS; Oto A
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):796-803. PubMed ID: 34583866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Different Measurement Methods of Arterial Input Function on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Dong W; Volk A; Djaroum M; Girot C; Balleyguier C; Lebon V; Garcia G; Ammari S; Temam S; Gorphe P; Wei L; Pitre-Champagnat S; Lassau N; Bidault F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 58(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 36269053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different population-averaged arterial-input-functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: Effects on pharmacokinetic parameters and their diagnostic performance.
    Othman AE; Falkner F; Kessler DE; Martirosian P; Weiss J; Kruck S; Kaufmann S; Grimm R; Kramer U; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 26708031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of contrast agent injection duration on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantification in prostate cancer.
    Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; van Osch MJP; van der Heide UA
    NMR Biomed; 2018 Sep; 31(9):e3946. PubMed ID: 29974981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic value of semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of functional parameters in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
    Hauth E; Halbritter D; Jaeger H; Hohmuth H; Beer M
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170067. PubMed ID: 28749167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection of Fitting Model and Arterial Input Function for Repeatability in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Prostate MRI.
    Peled S; Vangel M; Kikinis R; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM; Fedorov A
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):e241-e251. PubMed ID: 30467073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
    Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arterial spin labelling as a gadolinium-free alternative in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Boschheidgen M; Schimmöller L; Kasprowski L; Abrar D; Arsov C; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Ullrich T
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jul; 80():33-38. PubMed ID: 33905833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of dynamic
    Tau N; Berlin A; Yeung I; Halankar J; Murphy G; Jhaveri KS; Ghai S; Metser U
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 92(1094):20180568. PubMed ID: 30383459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability induced by the MR imager in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the prostate.
    Brunelle S; Zemmour C; Bratan F; Mège-Lechevallier F; Ruffion A; Colombel M; Crouzet S; Sarran A; Rouvière O
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Apr; 99(4):255-264. PubMed ID: 29428316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.