These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35549171)

  • 41. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
    Kang GD; Cao YM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
    Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Separation, anti-fouling, and chlorine resistance of the polyamide reverse osmosis membrane: From mechanisms to mitigation strategies.
    Liu C; Wang W; Yang B; Xiao K; Zhao H
    Water Res; 2021 May; 195():116976. PubMed ID: 33706215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of salt accumulation in the bioreactor on the performance of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+Reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation.
    Tay MF; Lee S; Xu H; Jeong K; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115352. PubMed ID: 31812816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Permeability of uncharged organic molecules in reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
    Dražević E; Košutić K; Svalina M; Catalano J
    Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():13-22. PubMed ID: 28292676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
    Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Removal Characteristics of N-Nitrosamines and Their Precursors by Pilot-Scale Integrated Membrane Systems for Water Reuse.
    Takeuchi H; Yamashita N; Nakada N; Tanaka H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30205535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prediction of organic contaminant rejection by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes using interpretable machine learning models.
    Zhu T; Zhang Y; Tao C; Chen W; Cheng H
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 857(Pt 1):159348. PubMed ID: 36228787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Swelling and morphology of the skin layer of polyamide composite membranes: an atomic force microscopy study.
    Freger V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jun; 38(11):3168-75. PubMed ID: 15224751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Removal of emerging organic micropollutants via modified-reverse osmosis/nanofiltration membranes: A review.
    Khoo YS; Goh PS; Lau WJ; Ismail AF; Abdullah MS; Mohd Ghazali NH; Yahaya NKEM; Hashim N; Othman AR; Mohammed A; Kerisnan NDA; Mohamed Yusoff MA; Fazlin Hashim NH; Karim J; Abdullah NS
    Chemosphere; 2022 Oct; 305():135151. PubMed ID: 35654232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fouling, performance and cost analysis of membrane-based water desalination technologies: A critical review.
    Nthunya LN; Bopape MF; Mahlangu OT; Mamba BB; Van der Bruggen B; Quist-Jensen CA; Richards H
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113922. PubMed ID: 34731960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification.
    Yang Z; Zhou Y; Feng Z; Rui X; Zhang T; Zhang Z
    Polymers (Basel); 2019 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 31362430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experimental study of water and salt fluxes through reverse osmosis membranes.
    Zhou W; Song L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May; 39(9):3382-7. PubMed ID: 15926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Permeability and selectivity of reverse osmosis membranes: correlation to swelling revisited.
    Dražević E; Košutić K; Freger V
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():444-52. PubMed ID: 24216230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: a review.
    Shen J; Schäfer A
    Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():679-91. PubMed ID: 25461935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.