These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35549359)

  • 1. Pupil dilation during recognition reflects the subjective recollection/familiarity experience at test rather than the level of processing at encoding.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 35549359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupil dilation during memory encoding reflects time pressure rather than depth of processing.
    Gross MP; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):264-281. PubMed ID: 32191068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil size tracks cue-trace interactions during episodic memory retrieval.
    Siefert EM; He M; Festa EK; Heindel WC
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jan; 61(1):e14409. PubMed ID: 37571917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3080-93. PubMed ID: 22902538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition memory and featural similarity between concepts: The pupil's point of view.
    Montefinese M; Vinson D; Ambrosini E
    Biol Psychol; 2018 May; 135():159-169. PubMed ID: 29665431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How the size of the to-be-learned material influences the encoding and later retrieval of associative memories: A pupillometric assessment.
    Pajkossy P; Racsmány M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226684. PubMed ID: 31891588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1971-89. PubMed ID: 21838656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.
    Smith CN; Wixted JT; Squire LR
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):15693-702. PubMed ID: 22049412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.
    Ramey MM; Henderson JM; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Nov; 149(11):2046-2062. PubMed ID: 32250136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity in the striatum and hippocampus: Across-study convergence.
    King DR; Chastelaine M; Elward RL; Wang TH; Rugg MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 354():1-7. PubMed ID: 28803854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trial-level fluctuations in pupil dilation at encoding reflect strength of relational binding.
    Whitlock J; Hubbard R; Ding H; Sahakyan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Feb; 50(2):212-229. PubMed ID: 37668566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can pupillometry distinguish accurate from inaccurate familiarity?
    Gomes CA; Montaldi D; Mayes A
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13825. PubMed ID: 33951188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of recollection and familiarity in visual working memory: A mixture of threshold and signal detection processes.
    Yonelinas AP
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Mar; 131(2):321-348. PubMed ID: 37326544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arousal-modulated memory encoding and retrieval in adults with autism spectrum disorder.
    Bast N; Gaigg SB; Bowler DM; Roessner V; Freitag CM; Ring M
    Autism Res; 2022 Sep; 15(9):1609-1620. PubMed ID: 35906845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recollection is fast and slow.
    Brainerd CJ; Nakamura K; Lee WA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):302-319. PubMed ID: 29698044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?
    Koen JD; Aly M; Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1726-41. PubMed ID: 23834057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saying "yes" when you want to say "no" - pupil dilation reflects evidence accumulation in a visual working memory recognition task.
    Lewandowska K; Gągol A; Sikora-Wachowicz B; Marek T; Fąfrowicz M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 May; 139():18-32. PubMed ID: 30851281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recollection versus strength as the primary determinant of hippocampal engagement at retrieval.
    Cohn M; Moscovitch M; Lahat A; McAndrews MP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Dec; 106(52):22451-5. PubMed ID: 20007783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupil dilation co-varies with memory strength of individual traces in a delayed response paired-associate task.
    van Rijn H; Dalenberg JR; Borst JP; Sprenger SA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51134. PubMed ID: 23227244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.