These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35549442)

  • 1. The frequency of referential patterns guides pronoun comprehension.
    Johnson ED; Arnold JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1325-1344. PubMed ID: 35549442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning the statistics of pronoun reference: By word or by category?
    Ye Y; Arnold JE
    Cognition; 2023 Oct; 239():105546. PubMed ID: 37478695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avoiding gender ambiguous pronouns in French.
    Fukumura K; Pozniak C; Alario FX
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104909. PubMed ID: 34649089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehending reflexive and clitic constructions in children with autism spectrum disorder and developmental language disorder.
    Moreno-Pérez FJ; Rodríguez-Ortiz IR; Tavares G; Saldaña D
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 Nov; 55(6):884-898. PubMed ID: 32844517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of cognitive control and referential complexity on adults' choice of referring expressions: Testing and expanding the referential complexity scale.
    Long M; Rohde H; Oraa Ali M; Rubio-Fernandez P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):109-136. PubMed ID: 37561512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Print exposure explains individual differences in using syntactic but not semantic cues for pronoun comprehension.
    Langlois VJ; Arnold JE
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104155. PubMed ID: 31874414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the effect of an arbitrary subject pronoun on relative clause comprehension: a study with Hebrew-speaking children.
    Haendler Y; Adani F
    J Child Lang; 2018 Jul; 45(4):959-980. PubMed ID: 29457575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of ambiguous pronouns in adults with intellectual disabilities.
    Hawthorne K; Loveall SJ
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2021 Feb; 65(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 33283378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation in pronoun resolution: Evidence from Brazilian and European Portuguese.
    Fernandes EG; Luegi P; Correa Soares E; de la Fuente I; Hemforth B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1986-2008. PubMed ID: 29698041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representations underlying pronoun choice in Italian and English.
    Fukumura K; Hervé C; Villata S; Zhang S; Foppolo F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1428-1447. PubMed ID: 34609230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Co-referential Processing of Pronouns and Repeated Names in Italian.
    de Carvalho Maia J; Vernice M; Gelormini-Lezama C; Lima ML; Almor A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Apr; 46(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 27578523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Person-reference in autism spectrum disorder: Developmental trends and the role of linguistic input.
    Barokova M; Tager-Flusberg H
    Autism Res; 2020 Jun; 13(6):959-969. PubMed ID: 31769223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.
    Barkley C; Kluender R; Kutas M
    Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 1629():143-59. PubMed ID: 26456801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 9():55. PubMed ID: 18588672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do Antecedent Semantics Influence Pronoun Interpretation? Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Simovic TV; Chambers CG
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 47(2):e13251. PubMed ID: 36745513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes Over Time in the Comprehension of He and They as Epicene Pronouns.
    Noll J; Lowry M; Bryant J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Oct; 47(5):1057-1068. PubMed ID: 29549477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns.
    Hendriks P; Koster C; Hoeks JC
    Lang Cogn Process; 2014 May; 29(4):391-407. PubMed ID: 24771955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Does Topicality Affect the Choice of Referential Form? Evidence From Mandarin.
    Lam SY; Hwang H
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Oct; 46(10):e13190. PubMed ID: 36240465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of discourse continuity on referential form choice.
    Hwang H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):626-641. PubMed ID: 36006717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension.
    Hurewitz F; Brown-Schmidt S; Thorpe K; Gleitman LR; Trueswell JC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Nov; 29(6):597-626. PubMed ID: 11196065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.