These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35551483)

  • 1. Lateral decubitus single position anterior-posterior (AP) fusion shows equivalent results to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at one-year follow-up.
    Ashayeri K; Alex Thomas J; Braly B; O'Malley N; Leon C; Cheng I; Kwon B; Medley M; Eisen L; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2227-2238. PubMed ID: 35551483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion.
    Ashayeri K; Leon C; Tigchelaar S; Fatemi P; Follett M; Cheng I; Thomas JA; Medley M; Braly B; Kwon B; Eisen L; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ
    Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):419-428. PubMed ID: 34600110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion.
    Buckland AJ; Ashayeri K; Leon C; Manning J; Eisen L; Medley M; Protopsaltis TS; Thomas JA
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):810-820. PubMed ID: 33197616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.
    Li Y; Dai Y; Wang B; Li L; Li P; Xu J; Jiang B; Lü G
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e475-e482. PubMed ID: 32891847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Nov; 30(21):e1382-e1390. PubMed ID: 36264190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.