These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35551843)
1. Reply to Frederic Panthier, Alba Sierra, and Olivier Traxer's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9. Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e37-e38. PubMed ID: 35551843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reply to Hyung Joon Kim and Khurshid R. Ghani's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9. Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e41-e42. PubMed ID: 35568598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reply to Alan J. Yaghoubian, Jonathan A. Khusid, and Mantu Gupta's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9. Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e45-e46. PubMed ID: 35551844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79: The Thulium Fibre Laser in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Prospect and Risk Coexist? Li J; Huang Y; Cao D; Wei Q Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):e71. PubMed ID: 35715364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9. Panthier F; Sierra A; Traxer O Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e35-e36. PubMed ID: 35527065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9. Kim HJ; Ghani KR Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e39-e40. PubMed ID: 35606231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9. Yaghoubian AJ; Khusid JA; Gupta M Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e43-e44. PubMed ID: 35661627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reply to Jinze Li, Yin Huang, Dehong Cao, and Qiang Wei's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79. Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):e72. PubMed ID: 35637042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Corrales M; Traxer O Eur Urol; 2023 Feb; 83(2):184-185. PubMed ID: 36463075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Editorial Comment: Thulium fibre laser versus Holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Danilovic A Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(2):267-268. PubMed ID: 36825958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. SuperPulsed Thulium fiber laser: The ultimate laser for lithotripsy? Keller EX; Traxer O Arch Esp Urol; 2020 Oct; 73(8):767-776. PubMed ID: 33025921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reply to Eugenio Ventimiglia, Steeve Doizi, Andrea Salonia, and Olivier Traxer's Letter to the Editor re: Farha Pirani, Salima S. Makhani, Frances Y. Kim, et al. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Safety and Clarity of Water Versus Saline Irrigant in Ureteroscopy. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.02.009. Pirani F; Makhani S; Kim F; Lay A; Cimmino C; Hartsell L; Spence A; Master VA; Ogan K Eur Urol Focus; 2021 May; 7(3):666-667. PubMed ID: 32536594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ureteroscopic holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for managing urinary tract calculi]. Pang ZL; Xiao CG; Zeng PQ; Lu GC; Zhang QJ Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 42(2):92-3. PubMed ID: 15009989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temperature profiles during ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser: Findings from a pre-clinical study. Æsøy MS; Juliebø-Jones P; Beisland C; Ulvik Ø Scand J Urol; 2022 Aug; 56(4):313-319. PubMed ID: 35924316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. Andreeva V; Vinarov A; Yaroslavsky I; Kovalenko A; Vybornov A; Rapoport L; Enikeev D; Sorokin N; Dymov A; Tsarichenko D; Glybochko P; Fried N; Traxer O; Altshuler G; Gapontsev V World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 31055626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the Novel Thulium Fiber Laser Have a Higher Risk of Urothelial Thermal Injury than the Conventional Holmium Laser in an Belle JD; Chen R; Srikureja N; Amasyali AS; Keheila M; Baldwin DD J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1249-1254. PubMed ID: 35302382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers. Ventimiglia E; Doizi S; Kovalenko A; Andreeva V; Traxer O BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):159-167. PubMed ID: 32277557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]