These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35555973)

  • 1. Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Goto T; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Hosoda K; Kaizu T; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):753-764. PubMed ID: 35555973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):959-969. PubMed ID: 36413257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Wakasugi M; Miyagaki H; Kawabata R; Tsujie M; Hasegawa J
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 33886065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: single-center, retrospective, propensity score analyses.
    Mazaki J; Ishizaki T; Kuboyama Y; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Yamada T; Nagakawa Y
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):157. PubMed ID: 38568362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
    Levic K; Donatsky AM; Bulut O; Rosenberg J
    Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 25377216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes.
    Shiomi A; Kinugasa Y; Yamaguchi T; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1701-10. PubMed ID: 27599703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furuatni A; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Hino H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1755-1762. PubMed ID: 30191369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Creatine kinase elevation after robotic surgery for rectal cancer due to a prolonged lithotomy position.
    Tsuchiya Y; Munakata S; Tsukamoto R; Okazawa Y; Mizukoshi K; Sugimoto K; Takahashi M; Tomiki YKY; Sakamoto K
    BMC Surg; 2020 Jun; 20(1):136. PubMed ID: 32546155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer.
    Numata M; Kazama K; Onodera A; Hara K; Atsumi Y; Okamoto H; Aoyama T; Tamagawa H; Godai T; Saeki H; Yukawa N; Shiozawa M; Rino Y; Masuda M
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Apr; 40(4):2337-2342. PubMed ID: 32234935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of T4 rectal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a national cancer database.
    Emile SH; Horesh N; Freund MR; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Silva-Alvarenga E; Dasilva G; Wexner SD
    Br J Surg; 2023 Jan; 110(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 36471483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Barzola E; Cornejo L; Gómez N; Pigem A; Julià D; Ortega N; Delisau O; Bobb KA; Farrés R; Planellas P
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):3013-3023. PubMed ID: 37924415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential
    Kim IK; Lee CS; Bae JH; Han SR; Alshalawi W; Kim BC; Lee IK; Lee DS; Lee YS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jan; 28(1):25. PubMed ID: 38231341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.
    Kim J; Baek SJ; Kang DW; Roh YE; Lee JW; Kwak HD; Kwak JM; Kim SH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Mar; 60(3):266-273. PubMed ID: 28177988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score-matched analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    Obatake M; Hotchi M; Ishimura N; Kanzaki M; Yoshikawa M; Tokuda K; Watanabe M; Kotegawa H; Yoshiyama H; Ohtani H; Harada M
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2023 Jul; 16(3):455-464. PubMed ID: 37076427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection for the treatment of stage II and III sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang J; Zhou J; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Sun L; Wang W; Wang L; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 May; 18(1):207. PubMed ID: 38727774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.